ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND BODY COMPOSITION AMONG PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS
Clinical medicine

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND BODY COMPOSITION AMONG PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS

Published 2025-04-16

Authors:

L.S. Vovkanych
T.M. Kutseryb
M.Y. Hrynkiv
F.V. Muzyka
S.I. Kras

Abstract:
The purpose of this research was to assess the effects of moderate, non-professional physical activity on the body composition of future physiotherapists. The study involved 102 physiotherapy students (aged 17–18): untrained (M1, F1) and non-professionally trained (M2, F2). Non-professional training lasted up to 5 hours weekly at a moderate activity level. We observed the larger muscle component in group M2 (42.51 %), than in group M1 (40.18 %, p ≤ 0.05), and in F2 (29.56 %) than in F1 (28.33 %, p ≤ 0.05). The fat component was larger in group M1 (18.74%), compared to group M2 (16.30 %, p ≤ 0.05), and in F1 (30.82 %) compared to F2 (27.58 %, p ≤ 0.05). The highest percentage of individuals with normal body mass was found in groups M2 and F2 – 84.2 % and 75.0 %, respectively. The analysis of correlation coefficients demonstrates a general trend of increased fat tissue content (r = 0.789–0.908) and decreased muscle tissue content (r = -0.108–-0.730) with higher BMI. We conclude that engagement in non-professional training induces alterations in both muscle and fat tissue content in the body of physiotherapy students.
Keywords:
non-professional training body mass index muscle component fat component
References:
  1. Aars NA, Jacobsen BK, Furberg AS, Grimsgaard S. Self-reported physical activity during leisure time was favourably associated with body composition in Norwegian adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(6):1122-7. doi: 10.1111/apa.14660.
  2. Badau D, Badau A, Trambitas C, Trambitas-Miron D, Moraru R, Stan AA, et al. Differences between active and semi-active students regarding the parameters of body composition using bioimpedance and magnetic bioresonance technologies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:7906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157906.
  3. Bento A, Carrasco L, Raimundo A. The mediating effect of physical fitness and dietary intake on the relationship of physical activity with body composition in high school students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):7301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127301.
  4. Gallo LA, Gallo TF, Young SL, Fotheringham AK, Barclay JL, Walker JL, et al. Adherence to dietary and physical activity guidelines in Australian undergraduate biomedical students and associations with body composition and metabolic health: A cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2021;13(10):3500. doi: 10.3390/nu13103500.
  5. Kęska A, Tkaczyk J, Malara M, Iwańska D. Metabolic risk factors in young men with healthy body fat but different levels of physical activity. Am J Mens Health. 2022;16(1):15579883211070384. doi: 10.1177/15579883211070384.
  6. Khan BZ, Sheth M. Physical activity level and physical fitness parameters in physiotherapy students. Int J Physiother Res. 2019;7(5):3247-51. doi: 10.16965/ijpr.2019.177.
  7. Kochman M, Kasperek W, Guzik A, Drużbicki M. Body composition and physical fitness: Does this relationship change in 4 years in young adults? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031579.
  8. Kutseryb T, Hrynkiv M, Vovkanych L, Muzyka F, Melnyk V. Anthropometric characteristics and body composition of female students involved in volleyball training. Anthropol Rev. 2022;85(4):31-42. doi: 10.18778/1898-6773.85.4.03.
  9. Lan C, Liu Y, Wang Y. Effects of different exercise programs on cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition in college students. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2022;20(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.12.004.
  10. Mahajan R, Rawat D. Determination of physical fitness index and its relation with body mass index among physiotherapy students. Physiotherapy. 2020;14(2):84. doi: 10.4103/PJIAP.PJIAP_25_19.
  11. Murphy C, Takahashi S, Bovaird J, Koehler K. Relation of aerobic fitness, eating behavior, and physical activity to body composition in college-age women: A path analysis. J Am Coll Health. 2021;69(1):30-7. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1647210.
  12. Pan M, Ying B, Lai Y, Kuan G. Status and influencing factors of physical exercise among college students in China: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013465.
  13. Popławska H, Dmitruk A, Hołub W. Body composition, physical fitness and physical activity among students from universities in Biała Podlaska. Pol J Sport Tourism. 2020;27(1):21-7. doi: 10.2478/pjst-2020-0004.
  14. WHO European health information at your fingertips. European Health Information Gateway. 2018. Available from: https://gateway.euro.who.int/en/indicators/mn_survey_19-cut-off-for-bmi-according-to-who-standards/#id=32083.
  15. Yarizadeh H, Eftekhar R, Anjom-Shoae J, Speakman JR, Djafarian K. The effect of aerobic and resistance training and combined exercise modalities on subcutaneous abdominal fat: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(1):179-96. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa090.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 21 No. 92 (2025) , с. 40-44
УДК 616.39:611.1:613.2:615.8:796