TREATMENT OF COMBAT FIRE INJURIES CONSEQUENCES OF THE LOWER LIMBS’ MAJOR VESSELS FOR THE PERIOD OF ATO AND JFO IN 2014-2019
Clinical medicine

TREATMENT OF COMBAT FIRE INJURIES CONSEQUENCES OF THE LOWER LIMBS’ MAJOR VESSELS FOR THE PERIOD OF ATO AND JFO IN 2014-2019

Published 2021-03-17

Authors:

V.A. Cherniak
V.M. Rogovskiy
Yu.V. Nahaliuk
S.V. Dybkaliuk
R.V. Gybalo
K.K. Karpenko

Abstract:
Gunshot wounds to blood vessels are severe injuries that are often combined with damage to other anatomical structures. Only 21 % had injuries to the main vessels and soft tissues, the rest had injuries to the bones and nerves. In 45.6 % the injuries were isolated, which makes 45.6 %, in 54.4 % – multiple, including injuries of the lower and upper extremities or both lower (22.8 %), head and neck injuries (1.8 %), chest organs (3.5 %), abdominal organs (3.5 %). In most cases, there were injuries of the femoral-popliteal segment, which is 78.9 %, less than the tibial segment 19.3 % and injuries of the femoral-popliteal and tibial segments by 1.8 %. All the wounded were of conscription age. The total of 565 operations were performed to 57 wounded, including 88 on the major vessels (15.6 %), amputations and reamputations – 15 (2.7 %), surgical treatment of the wound – 382 (67.6 %), others – 80 (14.1 %).
Keywords:
major vessels of lower extremities gunshot wounds amputation shunting surgical treatment of wound
References:
  1. Boiko VV, Prasol VO, Rogovsky VM, Ivanova YV. Ushkodgennya mahistralnykh sudyn. Kharkiv: Promin; 2020. 216p.[in Ukrainian]
  2. Korol SO. Medychna evakuatsiya v systemi nadannya dopomohy poranenym z vohnepalnymy perelomamy kistok homilky ta vidryvamy kintsivok pid chas antyterorystychnoyi operatsiyi. Travma. 2016; 4(17): 92–95. DOI: 10.22141/1608-1706.4.17.2016.77497. [in Ukrainian]
  3. Rogovsky VM, Shepetov MV, Gumenyuk NV, Gibalo RV. Lecheniye ognestrelnykh raneniy magistralnykh arteriy. Kiev: Kniga-plus; 2021. 114p. [in Russian]
  4. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): Implications for the future of combat casualty care. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73(6): 431–437. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318275 5dcc.
  5. Mathieu L, Bazile F, Barthélémy R. Damage control orthopedics in the context of battlefield injuries: the use of temporary external fixation on combat trauma soldiers. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011; 97(8):852–9 doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.05.014.
  6. Rich S. Vascular Trauma. Third edition. China: Elseviar; 2016. 1261p.
  7. Schweizer MA, Janak JC, Stockinger ZT, Monchal T. Description of trauma among French service members in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry: understanding the nature of trauma and the care provided. Mil Med Res. 2019 Feb 27; 6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40779-019-0197-6.
  8. Stern CA, Stockinger ZT, Todd WE, Gurney JM. An Analysis of Orthopedic Surgical Procedures Performed During U.S. Combat Operations from 2002 to 2016. Mil Med. 2019 Apr 24. pii: usz093. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz093.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 17 No. 76 (2021) , с. 153-158
УДК 616.14-089