BASIC PRINCIPLES OF EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATION OF LIPOSUCTION AND ABDOMINOPLASTY
Experemental medicine

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATION OF LIPOSUCTION AND ABDOMINOPLASTY

Published 2024-05-15

Authors:

O.V. Trombola
O.Yu. Atamanyuk

Abstract:
According to forecasts, by 2035, 50 % of the world's population will suffer from obesity, and we aimed to develop effective experimental models for the correction of its consequences, in the form of aesthetic defects of the anterior abdominal wall. By following a diet high in carbohydrates and saturated fat, obesity was achieved in 100 % of experimental animals. To ensure the possibility of conditional extrapolation of the obtained results to people, interventions and their combination were carried out in compliance with the basic principles of clinical operative technique. The rate of postoperative complications ranged from 7.1 % to 14.3 %, and changes in anthropometric parameters affected by obesity achieved aesthetic improvement and were characterized by statistical significance (p<0.05). The result of this work was a step-by-step algorithm with the possibility of dynamic control over functional, physiological, biochemical and pathomorphological changes in the organism of experimental animals. The insignificant number of postoperative complications and the simplicity of the proposed techniques for performing abdominoplasty, liposuction and their combination allow us to recommend the described techniques as effective mechanisms for experimental research into methods of surgical correction of aesthetic defects of the anterior abdominal wall.
Keywords:
liposuction abdominoplasty obesity experiment anterior abdominal wall aesthetic defects
References:
  1. Trombola O. Modelyuvannya ozhyrinnya v eksperimenti. Prykarpatskyy visnyk naukovoho tovaristva imeni Shevchenka PULS [Internet]. 2023 Dec [cited 2024 May 1]; (20 (70):69–76. Available from: https://pulsjournal.com.ua/index.php/puls/article/view/60; doi: 10.21802/2304-7437-2023-20(70)-69-76 [in Ukrainian]
  2. Agoston D. How to Translate Time? The Temporal Aspect of Human and Rodent Biology. Front Neurol. 2017 Mar 17; 8:92. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00092
  3. Campilo G. ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2022 [Internet]. Mont Royale: N.J.; 2023 Aug [cited 2024 May 1]. Available from: https://www.isaps.org/media/a0qfm4h3/isaps-global-survey_2022.pdf
  4. Carter CS, Richardson A, Huffman DM, Austad S. Bring Back the Rat! J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Feb 14;75(3):405–415. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz298
  5. Casal D, Pais D, Iria I, Videira PA, Mota-Silva E, Alves S. Blood Supply to the Integument of the Abdomen of the Rat: A Surgical Perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 11;5(9): e1454. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001454
  6. Council of Europe. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. [Internet] Strasbourg: European Treaty Series; 1986 Mar 18 [cited 2024 May 1] Available from: https://rm.coe.int/168007a67b
  7. D'Amore A, Fazzari M, Jiang HB, Luketich SK, Luketich ME, Hoff R et al. Nitro-Oleic Acid (NO2-OA) Release Enhances Regional Angiogenesis in a Rat Abdominal Wall Defect Model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018 Jun;24(11-12):889–904. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2017.0349
  8. Ghasemi A, Jeddi S, Kashfi K. The laboratory rat: Age and body weight matter. EXCLI J. 2021 Sep 23; 20:1431-1445. doi: 10.17179/excli2021-4072
  9. Lim KR, Cho JM, Yoon CM, Lee KC, Lee SY, Ju MH. Correlation between the time elapsed after liposuction and the risk of fat embolism: An animal model. Arch Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;45(1):14–22. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.01347
  10. Montesanti B, Kahhaleh E, De Mey A. Experience of abdominoplasty and analysis of the risk factors. Acta Chir Belg. 2022 Feb;122(1):1–6. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.2014034
  11. Nagendrababu V, Kishen A, Murray PE, Nekoofar MH, de Figueiredo JAP, Priya E et al. PRIASE 2021 guidelines for reporting animal studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration. Int Endod J. 2021 Jun;54(6):858–886. doi: 10.1111/iej.13481
  12. Osborne N, Avey MT, Anestidou L, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Griffin G. Improving animal research reporting standards: HARRP, the first step of a unified approach by ICLAS to improve animal research reporting standards worldwide. EMBO Rep. 2018 May;19(5):e46069. doi: 10.15252/embr.201846069
  13. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;177(16):3617–3624. doi: 10.1111/bph.15193
  14. Villegas-Alzate F, Caycedo-García DJ, Malaver-Acero R, Hidalgo-Ibarra SA, Cardona VA, Villegas-Mesa JD. TULUA: Effects of Flap Undermining and Type of Wall Plicature in a Rat Model Abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb;46(1):456–467. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02501-2.
  15. World Obesity Federation. World Obesity Atlas 2023. [Internet]. London: 2023 Mar; [cited 2024 May 1]. Available from: https://data.worldobesity.org/publications/?cat=19
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 20 No. 88 (2024) , с. 225-230
УДК 616-092.9:617.55-089.844