REGRESSION MODELS OF THE UPPER RESPIRATORY AREA IN YOUNG WOMEN AND YOUNG MEN WITHOUT AND TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE TYPE OF FACE IN DEPENDENCE ON TELEROENTGENOMETRIC INDICES

Authors:

Abstract:

In Ukrainian young women and young men with an orthognathic bite without and taking into account the type of face, reliable (p<0.001 in all cases) regression models of the area of the upper respiratory tract depending on the total complex of teleroentgenometric indices of the upper respiratory tract were constructed and analyzed. All models of the upper respiratory area in young women without taking into account the type of face, with very wide and wide face types and in young men without taking into account the type of face and with a wide face type depend on the determined total complex of teleroentgenometric indices of the upper respiratory tract by more than 50 % (respectively, R2=from 0.894 to 0.918 in young women and R2=0.905 and 0.917 in young men).

Keywords:

teleroentgenography cephalometry respiratory tract modeling young men young women orthognathic bite facial types

References:

1. Proffit UR, Fildz GU, Saver DM. Sovremennaia ortodontyia (perevod s anhlyiskoho D. S. Persyna). M.: MEDpress-ynform, 2006. [in Russian]
2. Ansar J, Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Singh RK, Agarwal DK, Bhattacharya P. Soft tissue airway dimensions and craniocervical posture in subjects with different growth patterns. The Angle orthodontist. 2015;85(4):604–10. doi: 10.2319/042314-299.1
3. Ansar J, Singh RK, Bhattacharya P, Agarwal DK, Verma SK, Maheshwari S. Cephalometric evaluation of the airway dimensions in subjects with different growth patterns. Journal of Orthodontic Research. 2015;3(2):108–12. doi: 10.4103/2321-3825.149051
4. Balakrishnan KP, Chockalingam PA. Ethnicity and upper airway measurements: A study in South Indian population. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2017;61(8):622–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_247_17
5. Bilston LE, Gandevia SC. Biomechanical properties of the human upper airway and their effect on its behavior during breathing and in obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2014;116(3):314-24. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00539.2013
6. Brown EC, Cheng S, McKenzie DK, Butler JE, Gandevia SC, Bilston LE. Respiratory movement of upper airway tissue in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2013;36(7):1069–76. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2812
7. Claudino LV, Mattos CT, de Oliveira Ruellas AC, Sant'Anna EF. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2013;143(6):799–809. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.015
8. Dmitriev MO, Tikholaz VO, Shepitko KV, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska MM, Androshchuk OV, Bobruk SV, Zakalata TR. (2018). Sexual dimorphism of normative cephalometric parameters determined by the Holdaway method in boys and girls of Podillia. World of Medicine and Biology. 2018;2(64):39–43. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-2-64-39-43
9. Feng X, Li G, Qu Z, Liu L, Näsström K, Shi XQ. Comparative analysis of upper airway volume with lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015;147(2):197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.025
10. Gu M, McGrath CP, Wong RW, Hägg U, Yang Y. Cephalometric norms for the upper airway of 12-year-old Chinese children. Head & face medicine. 2014:38. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-3
11. Gunas ІV, Dmitriev MO, Prokopenko SV, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska MM, Yeroshenko GA. Definition regulatory cephalometric options by the method of tweed international foundation for Ukrainian boys and girls. World of Medicine and Biology. 2017;13(4):27–31. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2017-4-62-27-31
12. Mislik B, Hänggi MP, Signorelli L, Peltomäki TA, Patcas R. Pharyngeal airway dimensions: a cephalometric, growth-study-based analysis of physiological variations in children aged 6–17. European journal of orthodontics. 2014;36(3):331–9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt068
13. Neelapu BC, Kharbanda OP, Sardana HK, Balachandran R, Sardana V, Kapoor P, Gupta A, Vasamsetti S. Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in adult obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cephalometric studies. Sleep medicine reviews. 2017; 31:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.01.007
14. Park JE, Gray S, Bennani H, Antoun JS, Farella M. Morphometric growth changes of the nasopharyngeal space in subjects with different vertical craniofacial features. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2016;150(3):451–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.021
15. Sprenger R, Martins LA, Dos Santos JC, de Menezes CC, Venezian GC, Degan VV. A retrospective cephalometric study on upper airway spaces in different facial types. Progress in orthodontics. 2017; 18:25. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0180-2

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 19 No. 85 (2023) , с. 112-116
УДК 616.21:616.314.26-053.81-073.75

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2023-3-85-112-116