TOPOGRAPHIC AND ANATOMICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE APPROACH TO PERFORMING INTRAPERITONEAL INJECTION
Experemental medicine

TOPOGRAPHIC AND ANATOMICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE APPROACH TO PERFORMING INTRAPERITONEAL INJECTION

Published 2023-04-12

Authors:

O.G. Yakymenko
S.O. Suchok

Abstract:
Performing intraperitoneal injections in rats is one of the most common and accessible methods of administering drugs and anesthetics in an experiment. In 74 % of cases (32/43), the cecum was located on the right and along the midline. A midline was performed in the laboratory animal from the external opening of the urethra to the xiphoid process. Through the point that divides it in half, a perpendicular was drawn along the left half of the abdomen’s front wall. A bisector formed at an angle of 90° to the inguinal fold was lowered into the left inguinal region. The injection site was defined as a point lying on ½ of the line formed by the bisector of the angle. The proposed technical solution has significant advantages: it justifies the place and point of intraperitoneal injection and reduces the risk of iatrogenic damage to abdominal organs.
Keywords:
intraperitoneal injection rats cecum
References:
  1. Al Shoyaib A, Archie SR, Karamyan VT. Intraperitoneal Route of Drug Administration: Should it Be Used in Experimental Animal Studies? Pharm Res. 2019;37(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s11095-019-2745-x.
  2. Baek JM, Kwak SC, Kim JY, Ahn SJ, Jun HY, Yoon KH, et al. Evaluation of a novel technique for intraperitoneal injections in mice. Lab Anim (NY). 2015;44(11):440–4. doi: 10.1038/laban.880.
  3. Fang H, Gong C, Fu J, Liu X, Bi H, Cheng Y, et al. Evaluation of 2 Rat Models for Sepsis Developed by Improved Cecal Ligation/Puncture or Feces Intraperitoneal-Injection. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e919054. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919054.
  4. Ginzel M, Martynov I, Haak R, Lacher M, Kluth D. Midgut development in rat embryos using microcomputed tomography. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):190. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01702-4.
  5. Guarnieri M. Considering the risks and safety of intraperitoneal injections. Lab Anim (NY). 2016 Apr;45(4):131. doi: 10.1038/laban.974.
  6. Komárek V, Gembardt C, Krinke A, Mahrous TA, Schaetti P. Synopsis of the Organ Anatomy. In: Krinke GJ, editor. The Laboratory Rat. London: Academic Press; 2000. p. 283–319. doi: 10.1016/B978-012426400-7/50054-6
  7. Talcott MR, Akers W, Marini RP. Chapter 25 - Techniques of Experimentation. In: Fox JG, Anderson LC, Otto GM, Pritchett-Corning KR, Whary MT, editors. Laboratory Animal Medicine (Third Edition). Boston: Academic Press; 2015. p. 1201–62.
  8. UBC. Animal Care Guidelines SOP: ACC‐2012‐Tech10 [Internet].Vancouver:UBC; 2014 [updated 2014; cited 2020 Apr 20]. Available from: https://animalcare.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/TECH%2010%20IP%20Injections%20in%20the% 20Mouse%20and%20Rat.pdf
  9. Uysal M, Gül SS, Karaman S, Tas U, Sapmaz HI, Uysal F, et al. Caecum location in laboratory rats and mice: an anatomical and radiological study. Lab Anim. 2017 Jun;51(3):245–255. doi: 10.1177/0023677216658916.
  10. Zatroch KK, Knight CG, Reimer JN, Pang DS. Refinement of intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital for euthanasia in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). BMC Vet Res. 2017 Feb 21;13(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0982-y.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 19 No. 84 (2023) , с. 247-250
УДК [615:032:611.346]:[616.001.53:599.23]