MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF NEURONS INNERVATING DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE LARGE INTESTINE
Experemental medicine

MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF NEURONS INNERVATING DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE LARGE INTESTINE

Published 2021-03-17

Authors:

R.E. Babaeva

Abstract:
The purpose of the study was to obtain complex morphological data on neurons innervating different parts of the large intestine. The object of the study was rats (n=17) of the Wistar line. The study used a universal method of impregnation. In addition, a 3D model of neurocytes of the ganglia of the intermuscular plexus of the large intestine was made. The results of the study showed that the large intestine has intra-organ ganglia located in the intermuscular and submucosal plexuses. The intermuscular plexus (Auerbach) of the colon has the form of a network with cells of different shapes and consists of nerve nodes containing Dogel cells of the 1st and 2nd type. In the intramural nodes of the large intestine, there are a large number of sensitive nerve endings. At the same time, a significant number of these endings in the nodes are formed by the processes of type 2 Dogel cells. A study of a three – dimensional image of a type 2 Dogel cell from the intermuscular plexus of the large intestine showed that this cell has an ovoid shape. The cell is flattened transversely and elongated longitudinally. The volume of its pericaryon is 2785.11 µm3, the volume of the nucleus is 647.7 µm3.
Keywords:
large intestine type 2 Dogel cells intramural nodes submucosal plexus intermuscular plexus
References:
  1. Markov II, Petrov ES, Markova VI. Universalnyy metod elektivnogo vyyavleniya argirofilnykh struktur. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2016;1:116–119. [in Russian]
  2. Nozdrachev AD. Vegetativnaya reflektornaya duga. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka, 2018:232. [in Russian]
  3. Sotnikov OS. Dinamika struktury zhivogo neyrona. Leningrad:, Nauka, 2013: 159. [in Russian]
  4. Sotnikov OS, Markov II. Kontseptsiya retikulyarnoy organizatsii nervnoy tkani Aleksandra Dogelya. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2018;1:8–19. [in Russian]
  5. Chuchkov VM, Gelashvili PA., Nikolenko VN, Sabel'nikov NE., Koshev VI, Gelashvili OA, et al. Strukturnye osnovy innervatsii i vaskulyarizatsii skeletnykh myshts i myshechnoy obolochki polykh organov mlekopitayushchikh i cheloveka. Samara: OOO «Ofort» Samara, 2010:203 s. [in Russian]
  6. Shvalev VN. Mirovoe znachenie kazanskoy neyrogistologicheskoy shkoly. Zaslugi ee rukovoditelya professora A.N. Mislavskogo i sokhranenie ee traditsiy v posleduyushchikh issledovaniyakh. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2013; 94(3): 424–429. [in Russian]
  7. Altschuler S, Escardo J, Lynn R. The central organization of the vagus nerve innervating the large intestine of the rat. J. Gastroenterology, 2013;104:502 – 509 doi: 10.1016/0016–5085(93)90419–d
  8. Bullock TH. Have brain dynamics evolved? Should we look for unique dynamics in the sapient species? Neural Comput. 2013;15(9):2013–27. doi: 10.1162/089976603322297269.
  9. Costa M, Wiklendt L, Keightley L, Brookes SJH, Dinning PG, Spencer NJ. New insights into neurogenic cyclic motor activity in the isolated guinea – pig large intestine. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(10):1–13. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13092
  10. Tai C, Booth A, de Groat C. Bladder and urethral sphincter responses evoked by microstimulation of S2 sacral spinal cord in spinal cord intact and chronic spinal cord injured cats. Exp. Neurol., 2014;190(l5):171–183.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 17 No. 76 (2021) , с. 163-167
УДК 572.785; 591.483