INCIDENCE OF OBSTETRIC AND EXTRAGENITAL PATHOLOGY IN VARIOUS-LEVEL OBSTETRIC INSTITUTIONS IN AZERBAIJAN

Authors:

Abstract:

The purpose of the work was to study the incidence of obstetric and extragenital pathology in various maternity institutions of the Republic of Azerbaijan for the period 2012-2014: in perinatal centers and district maternity hospitals. The study obstetric and extragenital pathology in obstetric institutions of various levels of the Azerbaijan Republic for the period 2012-2014 showed that oedema and proteinuria without hypertension were found to 1.2 times more often in women admitted to obstetric regional institutions of the 2nd level, premature rupture of membranes – 4 times more often, urinary tract infection and 4.7 times more often than hospitalized in institutions of the 3rd level. At the same time, in pregnant women hospitalized in level 3 institutions in 2012-2014, clinical manifestations of FNP were 1.1 times more common, and pelvic organ pathologies were 5.6 times more common than in district maternity hospitals (level 2).

Keywords:

prenatal period risk group obstetric pathology extragenital pathology hospitalization perinatal centers

References:

1. Gubler YeV, Genkin AA. Primeneniye neparametricheskikh kriteriyev statistiki v mediko-biologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. L.:Meditsina. 1973: 140. [in Russian]
2. Yensegenova ZZh, Zhukembayeva AM, Aysautov AB. Lecheniye beremennykh zhenshchin s ekstragenitalnoy patologiyey i puti povysheniya effektivnosti. Vestnik KaZNMU. 2017;3:5–6. [in Russian]
3. Savel'yeva GM, Serov VN, Sukhikh GT. Klinicheskiye rekomendatsii. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 4-e izd. M.: G·EOTAR-Media. 2014: 1024. [in Russian]
4. Serova OF, Serova OF, Chernigova IV, Danilova YeV, Yeremenko YeYe, Toloknov VI. Ochen' ranniye prezhdevremenn·yye rody: sovremennyy podkhod. ZH.Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. Spetsvypusk «Beremennost' vysokogo riskA» .2014; 38: 4–10. [in Russian]
5. Sitnikova LN, Lavlinskaya LI. Organizatsiya meditsinskoy pomoshchi beremennym grupp vysokogo riska. Yestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy.2014;1:45–52 [in Russian]
6. Tsybul'skaya IS, Nizamova ER. Problemy formirovaniya zdorov'ya zhenshchin-materey i ikh potomstva v sovremennoy Rossii. Menedzher zdravookhraneniya. 2016; 7: 29–45 [in Russian]
7. Shklyayev AYE, Semеnova MV, Lyalina AS, Maksimov IYE. Otsenka faktorov riska sverkhrannikh prezhdevremennykh rodov. Vestnik Avitsenny. 2019;21(1):26–32. DOI: 10.25005/2074-0581-2019-21-1-26-32 [in Russian]
8. Frolova OG, Gudimova VV. Perinatal'nyy tsentr, yego rol' v okazanii akusherskoy i neonatal'noy pomoshchi . Akush. i gin. M. 2003; 5:48−50. [in Russian]
9. Edwards K, Impey L. Extreme preterm birth in the right place: a quality improvement project BMJ . 2019; 18:F1–4. http://fn.bmj.com/
10. Stewart LD, Barfield DW. Updates on an At-Risk Population: Late-Preterm and Early-Term Infants. CLINICAL REPORT: Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care. PEDIATRICS J. 2019; 144 (5): 1–10. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2019/10/17/peds.2019-2760

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 17 No. 75 (2021) , с. 106-110
УДК 618. 3; 614.2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2021-1-75-106-110