ANATOMIC VARIABILITY OF THE PANCREAS ORGANOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS IN HUMAN FETUSES AND NEWBORNS

Authors:

Abstract:

Pancreas studies were performed on 72 samples of human fetal corpses (from 4 to 10 months) with the mean parieto-calcaneal length of 165.0 to 500.0 mm and on 9 samples of newborns by means of morphological examination. It is established that in fetal and early neonatal ontogenetic periods the typical pancreas shape is curved (72±5 %) and its alternative forms are arched (18±4 %) and straight (10±2 %). The organometric pancreatic parameters and its anatomic parts have two periods of the accelerated development and one period of the relatively slow development. The second period of the relatively slow development is defined only for the gland body width. The model of predicting the standard values of pancreatic morphometric parameters has the following design: pancreatic length = β0 + 0.094 x parieto-calcaneal length of a human fetal corpse, where β0: 3.342 if the age period = 4 months; 4.731 = 5 months; 6.924 = 6 months; 10.349 = 7 months; 8.244 = 8 months; 13.821 = 9 months; 17.489 = 10 months; 18.087 = newborns.

Keywords:

pancreas anatomy fetus newborn human

References:

1. Kosynskyy OV, Buzmakov DL. Pokaznyky invalidnosti vnaslidok patolohiyi pidshlunkovoyi zalozy v Ukrayini. Ukrayinskyy visnyk medyko-sotsialnoyi ekspertyzy. 2015; 3(17):26-9. [in Ukrainian]
2. Sled ON, Merzlikin NV, Sled NYu, Popov AYe, Mendeleyeva LYa, Kosmachenko SP, et al. Khirurgicheskoye lecheniye khronicheskogo kistoznogo pankreatita. 2016; 15(2):12-3. DOI 10.20538/1682-0363-2016-2-85–97. [in Russian]
3. Slobodyan OM, Yuzko RV. Fetalna orhanometrychna kharakterystyka anatomichnykh chastyn zihnutoyi formy pidshlunkovoyi zalozy. Svit medytsyny ta biolohiyi. 2014; 2(44):163-6. [in Ukrainian]
4. Smirnova AV, Trubitsina IYe. Pankreatit. Narusheniye mikrotsirkulyatsii. Vestn. kluba pankreatol. 2014; 1(22):24-8. [in Russian]
5. Amann ST, Yadav D, Barmada MM. Physical and mental quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: a case-control study from the North American Pancreatitis Study 2 cohort. Pancreas. 2015 Mar; 42(2):293-300. DOI: 10.1097 / mpa.0b013e31826532e7.
6. Burkhart RA, Gerber SM, Tholey RM, Lamb KM, Somasundaram A, McIntyre CA, et al. Incidence and severity of pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest. Surg. 2015; 19:217-25. DOI: 10.1007 / s11605-014-2669-z.
7. Damoli L, Butturini G, Ramera M. Paiella S, Marchegiani G, Bassi C. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery – a review. Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne. 2015; 10:141-9. DOI: 10.5114 / wiitm.2015.52705.
8. Lévy P, Domínguez-Muñoz E, Imrie C. Epidemiology of chronic pancreatitis: burden of the disease and consequences. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Oct;2(5):345-54. DOI: 10.1177 / 2050640614548208.
9. Perwaiz A, Singh A, Chaudhary A. Surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Indian J Surg. 2015; 74(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007 / s12262-011-0374-7.
10. Rana SS, Bhasin DK. Nonfluoroscopic endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of pseudocysts: a pictorial technical review. Endosc. Ultrasound. 2015; 4:92-7. DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.156719.
11. Wang GX, Liu X, Wang S, Ge N, Guo J-T, Liu W, et al. Stent displacement in endoscopic pancreatic pseudocyst drainage and endoscopic management. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015; 21:2249-53. DOI:10.3748 / wjg.v21.i7.2249.

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 16 No. 74 (2020) , с. 205-209
УДК 611.37.018:611.068]-053.15-053.31

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2020-4-74-205-209