FEATURES OF USING INDIVIDUALIZED STANDARD VALUES FOR THE INCISORS’ POSITIONS ACCORDING TO С. STEINER IN UKRAINIAN YOUNG MEN AND GIRLS
Clinical medicine

FEATURES OF USING INDIVIDUALIZED STANDARD VALUES FOR THE INCISORS’ POSITIONS ACCORDING TO С. STEINER IN UKRAINIAN YOUNG MEN AND GIRLS

Published 2020-05-19

Authors:

М.О. Dmitriev
Yu.Yu. Trofimenko
O.V. Cherkasova
V.V. Kernychnyi
I.V. Gunas

Abstract:
The purpose of the study is to investigate the correctness of the use of the recommended indexes of the position of the central incisors according to the data obtained by S. Stainer for Ukrainian young men and women with orthognathic bite. Cephalometric analysis was performed using OnyxCeph 3D pro, statistical analysis, construction of polynomial and regression models was performed in MS Excell and "Statistica 6.0". Analysis of the distribution of angular and linear indices of the position of the central incisors in Ukrainian young men and women revealed significant variability with respect to the ANB angle. Therefore, to perform more accurate diagnosis and treatment planning for individual human characteristics for Ukrainian young men and women in the diagnostic cephalometric method S. Stainer it is recommended to use the developed prognostic models for determining the linear and angular indicators of the position of the central incisors of the upper and lower jaw.
Keywords:
central incisors С. Stainer cephalometric analysis Ukrainian young men and girls
References:
  1. Nettsel F, Shultts K. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po ortodonticheskoy diagnostike. Lvov: GalDent. 2006. 135. [in Russian]
  2. Bronfman CN, Janson G, Pinzan A, Rocha TL. Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2015; 20(6): 43-51.
  3. Dmytrenko Maryna I., Nesterenko Oleh N. Results of follow-up study of occlusion state in Ukrainian schoolchildren. Journal of Stomatology (Poland). 2016; 69(6): 725-728.
  4. Gonzalez MB, Caruso JM, Sugiyama RM, Schlenker WL. Establishing cephalometric norms for a Mexican population using Ricketts, Steiner, Tweed and Arnett analyses. APOS Trends in Orthodontics. 2013 Nov 16; 3(6):171-7.
  5. Hussien E, Al-Khateeb S, Mowais MA. Palestinians norms of Steiner cephalometric analysis. World journal of orthodontics. 2010 Dec 1; 11(4):5-9.
  6. Ji-Hwan K, Odontuya G, Bazar A, Shin-Jae L, Tae-Woo K. Comparison of cephalometric norms between Mongolian and Korean adults with normal occlusions and wellbalanced profiles. Korean J. Orthod. 2011; 41(1), 42-50.
  7. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Vogels 3rd DS, Vogels PB. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO. 2014 Oct; 48(10):607-630.
  8. Linjawi AI. Age- and gender-related incisor changes in different vertical craniofacial relationships. J Orthod Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec; 5(4):132-137.
  9. Lombardo L, Perri A, Arreghini A, Latini M, Siciliani G. Three-dimensional assessment of teeth first-, second- and third-order position in Caucasian and African subjects with ideal occlusion. Prog Orthod. 2015; 16:11.
  10. Navarro AC, Carreiro LS, Rossato C, Takahashi R, Lima CE. Assessing the predictability of ANB, 1-NB, P-NB and 1-NA measurements on Steiner cephalometric analysis. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2013 Apr; 18(2):125-32.
  11. Phulari B. An atlas on cephalometric landmarks. JP Medical Ltd; 2013 Mar 30.
  12. Rathore AS, Dhar V, Arora R, Diwanji A. Cephalometric norms for mewari children using Steiner’s analysis. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2012 Sep; 5(3):173.
  13. Sharma JN. Steiner’s cephalometric norms for the Nepalese population. Journal of orthodontics. 2011 Mar 1; 38(1):21-31.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 16 No. 72 (2020) , с. 44-48
УДК 616.314-084