POSSIBILITY OF USING DERMATOGLYPHIC PARAMETERS OF THE MEDIUM AND PROXIMAL FINGER FALANGES OF THE HANDS WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF DVI-INTERPOL
Clinical medicine

POSSIBILITY OF USING DERMATOGLYPHIC PARAMETERS OF THE MEDIUM AND PROXIMAL FINGER FALANGES OF THE HANDS WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF DVI-INTERPOL

Published 2020-05-19

Authors:

Yu.Z. Kotsiubynska
N.M. Kozan
H.M. Zelenchuk
S.V. Koliadenko
T.V. Vakar

Abstract:
The study material was the dermatological parameters of the middle and proximal phalanges of the fingers that were obtained from 460 representatives of different ethno-territorial groups of the Carpathian region with the use of Futronic's FS80 USB 2.0 optical scanner, that were subjected to quantitative and qualitative study and processing by one- and multidimensional statistical analysis. The morphological structure peculiarities of the dermatoglyphic parameters of the middle and proximal finger phalanges have been studied; it is suggested to use "Complementary classification of skin patterns of middle and proximal phalanges of fingers" (Author's certificate of scientific work No. 74560); it is suggested to classify the dermatoglyphs of the middle and proximal phalanges of the fingers by the complexity of the morphological structure. Based on the performed research, a separate self-sufficient system of dermatoglyphic identification features was developed, which is able to increase and confirm the reliability of the complex identification examination results according to DVI Interpol criteria.
Keywords:
forensic medicine identification of the person dermatological parameters
References:
  1. Kostenko YeYa. Pryntsypy funktsionuvannya systemy DVI INTERPOL ta spetsializovanoho prohramnoho zabezpechennya PLASS DATA SOFTWARE u rozrizi miznarodnoyi spivpratsi ta pislyadyplomnoyi osvity spetsialistiv stosovno identyfikatsii osib. Sudovo-medychna ekspertyza. 2015; 2:16-28. [in Ukrainian]
  2. Fedin IV, Chikun VI, GorbunovNS, KhludnevaNV. Problema identifikatsii cheloveka. Vestnik sudebnoy meditsiny. 2018; 7(1):56-60. [in Russian]
  3. Chistikina TA, Zoroastrov OM, Kolomys VE. Compleksnaya diagnostyka grup po ikh svoistvam na osnove dermatoglifiki paltsev ruk. Sydebnaya ekspertyza. 2009; 52(5):11-4. [in Russian]
  4. Shpak LYu. Dermatoglifika falang paltsev kisti (antropologicheskiye i sudebno-meditsinskiye aspekty) (avtoreferat). Moskva; 2003. [in Russian]
  5. Awuah D, Dzogbefia VP, Chattopadhyay PK. Finger dermatoglyphics of the Asante population of Ghana. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies. 2017; 4(4):333-6.
  6. Dhall JK, KapoorAK. Fingerprint ridge density as a potential forensic anthropological tool for sex identification. Journal of forensic sciences. 2016; 61(2):424-9.
  7. Gunas VI. Modeling using discrimination analysis, priority of practical health in administrative-territorial regions of Ukraine on the basis of dermatoglyphic indicators features. World of Medicine and Biology. 2018; 63(1):9-14.
  8. Mbaka G, Ejiwunmi A, Alabi O, Olatayo T. Digital dermatoglyphic variation and migratory pattern of ethnic Liberians. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016; 6(4):416-21.
  9. Mishalov V, Klimas L, Gunas V. Demographic variability indicators of somatically healthy men from different administrative and territorial regions of Ukraine. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences. 2016; 29(2):90-3.
  10. Mishalov VD, Gunas VІ. Discriminating models of dermatoglyphic priority of practically healthy men to southern or other administrative-territorial regions of Ukraine. Forensic-medical examination. 2018; 1:17-21.
  11. Mohammed B, Garba SH, Adeyemi LB. Digital dermatoglyphics patterns of the Kanuri ethnic group of North Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. 2014; 9(2):985-8.
  12. Nayak VC, Rastogi P, Kanchan T, Yoganarasimha K, Kumar GP, Menezes RG. Sex differences from fingerprint ridge density in Chinese and Malaysian population. Forensic science international. 2010; 197(1-3):67-9.
  13. Neumann C, Evett IW, Skerrett J. Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2012; 175(2):371-415.
  14. Sweet D. INTERPOL DVI best-practice standards--An overview. Forensic science international. 2010; 1-3:18-21.
  15. Taura MG, Adamu LH, Asuku AY, Umar KB, Abubakar M. Adjacent digit fingerprint white line count differences: a pointer to sexual dimorphism for forensic application. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2019; 9(1):63.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 16 No. 72 (2020) , с. 74-79
УДК 340.6+343