MODELING THE CORRECT FORM OF THE DENTAL ARCH IN GIRLS WITH A VERY BROAD FACE DEPENDING ON CEPHALOMETRIC INDICATORS ACCORDING TO STEINER’S OR TWEED’S METHODS AND TOOTH DIMENSIONS

Authors:

Abstract:

In young Ukrainian women with a physiological bite and a very wide facial type, based on the analysis of the features of teleradiometric indicators according to the Steiner or Tweed methods and computed tomography sizes of the teeth, all possible (18 models each) reliable (p<0.001 in all cases) highly informative (with a coefficient of determination greater than 0.6) regression models of linear parameters of the dental arches were constructed and analyzed (respectively R2= from 0.716 to 0.936 when taking into account teleradiometric indicators according to the Steiner method; and R2= from 0.657 to 0.878 when taking into account teleradiometric indicators according to the Tweed method).

Keywords:

dentistry teleradiometry computed tomography dimensions of teeth and dental arches regression analysis Ukrainian young women physiological bite very wide face type

References:

1. Al-Abdallah M, AlHadidi A, Hammad M, Al-Ahmad H. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies: a comparison between maxillary and mandibular tooth agenesis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015 Nov 1;148(5):793-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.024.
2. Al-Gunaid TH, Bukhari AK, El Khateeb SM, Yamaki M. Relationship of mandibular ramus dimensions to lower third molar impaction. European journal of dentistry. 2019 May;13(02):213-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693922.
3. Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2018;23(06):40-e1. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl.
4. Arabion H, Gholami M, Dehghan H, Khalife H. Prevalence of Impacted Teeth among Young Adults: A Retrospective Radiographic Study. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):131-7.
5. Ardani IG, Kannayyah D, Triwardhani A. Correlation of maxillary and mandibular arch form and tooth size ratio in ethnic Javanese malocclusion patient. Journal of International Oral Health. 2019 Mar 1;11(2):75-9. doi: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_8_19.
6. De Ridder L, Aleksieva A, Willems G, Declerck D, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M. Prevalence of orthodontic malocclusions in healthy children and adolescents: a systematic review. International Journal of environmental research and public health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127446.
7. Elhiny OA, Sharaf RF, Elyazied MA, Radwan E, Salem GA. The relationship between tooth size, arch length and arch perimeter in Egyptians. Bali Medical Journal. 2021 Dec 30;10(3):1056-60. doi: 10.15562/bmj.v10i3.2618.
8. Hlongwa P, Moshaoa MA, Musemwa C, Khammissa RA. Incidental Pathologic Findings from orthodontic pretreatment panoramic radiographs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043479.
9. Kouvelis G, Dritsas K, Doulis I, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N. Effect of orthodontic treatment with 4 premolar extractions compared with nonextraction treatment on the vertical dimension of the face: A systematic review. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2018 Aug 1;154(2):175-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.007.
10. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L., et al. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020 Feb;21(2):115-22. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05.
11. Marchenko АV, Gunas IV, Petrushanko TO, Serebrennikova OА, Trofimenko YuYu. Computer-tomographic characteristics of root length incisors and canines of the upper and lower jaws in boys and girls with different craniotypes and physiological bite. Wiadomosci Lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 2017;70(3 pt 1):499-502. PMID: 28711896.
12. Mishra RK, Kafle D, Gupta R. Analysis of Interarch tooth size relationship in Nepalese subjects with Normal occlusion and malocclusions. International Journal of Dentistry. 2019;2019(1):2761427. doi: 10.1155/2019/2761427.
13. Murtazaev SS, Pak IE, Murtazaev S. Anthropometrical Parameters of the Orthognathic Bite in People of Uzbek Nationality. International Journal of BioMedicine. 2015 Mar 1;5(1):35-7. doi: 10.21103/Article5(1)_D1.
14. Omar H, Alhajrasi M, Felemban N, Hassan A. Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample. Saudi medical journal. 2018 Jan;39(1):86-91. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.1.21035.
15. Ryabov TV, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska ММ, Ishchuk OH, Zavrelovska IV, Povsheniuk AV, Gadzhula NG, et al. Regression models of computed tomography dimensions necessary for constructing the correct shape of the dental arch in Ukrainian young men and young women with physiological occlusion and a wide facial type depending on the characteristics of teleradiometric indicators according to the Steiner or Tweed methods and computed tomography dimensions of the teeth. Reports of Morphology. 2025;31(2):13-25. doi: 10.31393/10.31393/morphology-journal-2024-31(2)-02.

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 21 No. 93 (2025) , с. 125-130
УДК 616.314.26:616.714.1-053.81-073.75

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2025-3-93-125-130