EVALUATION OF LONG-TERM RESULTS OF VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY WITH APPENDICES AND BILATERAL FIXATION OF THE VAGINAL STUMP IN WOMEN WITH GENITAL PROLAPSE

Authors:

Abstract:

Genital prolapse is a common disease with a severe course. Treatment methods are usually surgical, but the benefits of individual surgical treatments are still an open question. The purpose of the study was to analyze the results of the treatment of women with genital prolapse after 6 and 12 months who underwent videolaparoscopic radical hysterectomy with appendages and bilateral fixation of the vaginal stump. After the above-mentioned surgical treatment of women with genital prolapse, a significant decrease of 5 times was found in the number of women complaining of difficulty urinating, complaints of the feeling of a foreign body in the vagina were noted 3 times less often. Urinary incontinence was not detected in the examined women, as well as a non-specific inflammatory process in the vagina after surgical treatment was noted 9 times less often compared to the same data before the operation.

Keywords:

gynecology surgery combined operations laparoscopic operation operative treatment

References:

1. Nieminen K. Nastanova 00552. Henitalnyi prolaps [Internet]. 2017 [onovleno 2017 Serp 10; tsytovano 2024 Zhovt 11]. Dostupno: https://guidelines.moz.gov.ua/documents/3382 [in Ukrainian].
2. Blotta RM, Costa SDS, Trindade EN, Meurer L, Maciel-Trindade MR. Collagen I and III in women with diastasis recti. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Jun 7;73:e319. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e319.
3. Bretschneider CE, Jallad K, Paraiso MFR. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update. Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Jun;69(3):295–303. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04017-5.
4. Carroll L, O' Sullivan C, Doody C, Perrotta C, Fullen B. Pelvic organ prolapse: The lived experience. PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0276788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276788.
5. Collins S, Lewicky-Gaupp C. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022 Mar;51(1):177–193. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.10.011.
6. Gong R, Xia Z. Collagen changes in pelvic support tissues in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.012.
7. Iglesia CB, Smithling KR. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Aug 1;96(3):179–185. PMID: 28762694.
8. Jeppson PC, Sung VW. Hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: indications and techniques. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;57(1):72–82. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000002.
9. Ramalingam K, Monga A. Obesity and pelvic floor dysfunction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29:541–7.
10. Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, van Eijndhoven HW, van Leijsen SA, Vergeldt TF, et al. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):192–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.046.
11. Tunn R, Baessler K, Knüpfer S, Hampel C. Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Feb 3;120(5):71–80. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0406.
12. van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, et al. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1284–1293. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16242.
13. Weintraub AY, Glinter H, Marcus-Braun N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jan-Feb;46(1):5–14. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0581.
14. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141–8.

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 20 No. 90 (2024) , с. 48-52
УДК 618.15-089-085:616.6

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2024-4-90-48-52