RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF ENDOSURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF EARLY INTRAABDOMINAL COMPLICATIONS IN POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD

Authors:

Abstract:

The purpose of the study was to improve the treatment results of early intra-abdominal complications by optimizing diagnostic methods and surgical tactics. The main group consisted of 1326 patients who preferred the active use of minimally invasive technologies in choosing surgical tactics and in the treatment process. The control group included 342 patients. In this group, relaparotomy was preferred for the correction of postoperative intra-abdominal complications. Relaparotomy on demand was performed in 145 (10.9 %) patients due to the obvious impossibility of endosurgical elimination of the complication at the preoperative stage. Mortality when using minimally invasive technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal complications arising after abdominal surgeries was 5.3 %, and when performing relaparotomy to correct complications - 27.8 %. The average length of stay of patients in the clinic after repeated operations using minimally invasive technologies was 14.2±5.3 days and after relaparotomy – 25.4±7.3 days. Thus, the use of the algorithm for diagnosing complications using minimally invasive technologies allows for the timely implementation of the capabilities of endosurgical and traditional technologies and thereby improves the treatment results of postoperative abdominal complications.

Keywords:

surgical treatment intra-abdominal complications abdominal operations minimally invasive technologies relaparotomy

References:

1. Chen YI, Itoi T, Baron TH, Nieto J, Haito-Chavez Y, Grimm IS, et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017; 31:2946–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5311-1.
2. Clifford RE, Fowler H, Govindarajah N, Vimalachandran D, Sutton PA. Early anastomotic complications in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of techniques for endoscopic salvage. Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06670-9.
3. Drefs M, Schardey J, Wirth U, Burian M, Zimmermann P, Werner J. Endoscopic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Leaks. Visc Med. 2022; 38:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1159/000526759.
4. Fan W, Tan S, Wang J, Wang Ch, Xu H, Zhang L et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022; 31:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1792500.
5. Manta R, Caruso A, Cellini C, Sica M, Zullo A, Mirante VG. et al. Endoscopic management of patients with post-surgical leaks involving the gastrointestinal tract: A large case series. United Eur Gastroentero J. 2016 Dec; 4:770–777 https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640615626051.
6. Medas R, Rodrigues-Pint E. Endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal postsurgical leaks: a narrative review. Clinical Endoscopy 2023;56(6):693–705.: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.043.
7. Mukewar S, Kumar N, Catalano M, Thompson C, Abidi W, Harmsen W, et al. Safety and efficacy of fistula closure by endoscopic suturing: a multi-center study. Endoscopy. 2016; 48:1023–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114036.
8. Prykhidko RA, Dudchenko MO, Kravtsiv MI, Zaiets SM, Ivashchenko DM, Chelishvili AL. et al. A Three-stage therapeutıc and dıagnostıc algorıthm ın mechanıcal jaundıce of dıfferent genesıs and the most effectıve mını-ınvasıve method of ıts treatment. World of medicine and biology. 2022. № 2 (80). 119–124. https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2022-2-80-119-124.
9. Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, DeFilippis EM, Dimaio CJ, Gonzalez S, Gonda T, et al. A large multicenter experience with endoscopic suturing for management of gastrointestinal defects and stent anchorage in 122 patients: A retrospective review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 50:388–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000336.
10. Winder JS, Pauli EM. Comprehensive management of full thickness luminal defects: The next frontier of gastrointestinal endscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul 10; 7:758–768. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i8.758.

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 20 No. 89 (2024) , с. 184-189
УДК 617.55-089.168.1-06:616-072.1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2024-3-89-184-189