РусскийEnglishУкраїнська
  • Main
  • Useful links
  • Information for Contributors
  • About
  • Editorial board

  • Article
    Shylenko D.R., Shylenko R.V., Krivda M., Rogov I.

    INDIVIDUAL SELECTION PIN SYSTEMS DEPENDING ON A CLINICAL SITUATION


    About the author: Shylenko D.R., Shylenko R.V., Krivda M., Rogov I.
    Heading ОГЛЯДИ ЛІТЕРАТУРИ
    Type of article Обзорная статья
    Annotation In article is carried out the analysis of data stated in the literature about a problem of reinforcing of a teeth factory by pin-systems. Conclusions are drawn on features of their application and the technician of selection.
    Tags pin-systems, Individual selection.
    Bibliography
    • Morgano S.M. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional prin­ciples in present and future contexts// J Prosthet Dent, - 1996, P.75-80.
    • · Abou-Rass M. Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth. // Curr Opin Dent, - 1992, P.99-107.
    • · Sorensen J.A. Preservation of tooth structure.// J Calif Dent Assoc, - 1988, P.15-22.
    • · Guzy G.E. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement / J.I. Nicholls //J Prosthet Dent, - 1979, С.39-44.
    • · Trope M. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth/ D.O. Maltz, L.Tronstad //Endod Dent Traumatol, - 1985, P.108-11.
    • · Sidoli N.G. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system./ P.A.King, D.J. Setchell // J Prosthet Dent, - 1997, P. 5-9.
    • · Hock D. Impact resistance of post and cores// Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Dentistry; 1976, P.23-25
    • · Mattison G.D. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast-gold endodontic posts // J Prosthet Dent, - 1982, P.407-411.
    • · Tjan A.H. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. / S.Whang //J Prosthet Dent, - 1985, P.496-500.
    • Trabert K.C. Tooth fracture — a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. / A.A.Caputo, M.Abou-Rass // J Endod, - 1978, P.341-345
    • Milot P. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design./ R.S. Stein // J Prosthet Dent, - 1992, P.428-435.
    • Burgess J.O. The resistance to tensile, compres­sion, and torsional forces provided by four post systems./ J.B.Summitt, J.W. Robbins // J Prosthet Dent, -1992, P.899-903.
    • Roberts D.H. The failure of retainers in bridge prostheses. An analysis of 2000 retainers. // Br Dent J, - 1970, P.117-124.
    • Mentink A. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration./ R.Meeuwissen, A . Kayser, J.Mulder // J Oral Rehabil1, - 1993, P.455-461.
    • Lewis R. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. / B.G. Smith // BrDent J, - 1988, P.95-97.
    • Hopwood W.A. Clinical assessment of a split-shank post system in permanent molar and premolar teeth./ N.H.Wilson // Quintessence Int, - 1990, P.907-911.
    • Torbjorner A, Survival rate and failure character­istics for two post designs./ S. Karlsson, P.A. Odman //J Prosthet Dent, - 1995,P.439-444.
    • Harper R.H. Treatment of the pulpless tooth during post and core construction. / M.R. Lund // Oper Dent, - 1976, P.55-60.
    • Mondelli J An acrylic resin pattern for a cast doweland core. / A.C.Piccino, A. Berbert //J Prosthet Dent, - 1971, P.413-417.
    • Pickard H.M. Variants of the post crown. // Br Dent J, - 1964, P.517-526.
    • Blaukopf E.R. Direct acrylic Davis crown technic.// J Am Dent Assoc, - 1944, P.544-550.
    • Baraban D.J. The restoration of pulpless teeth.// Dent Clin North Am, - 1967, P.633-653.
    • Jacoby W.E. Jr. Practical technique for the fabrication of a direct pattern for a post-core restoration // J Prosthet Dent, - 1976, P.357-360.
    • Dewhirst R.B. Jr. Dowel-core fabrication. / Fisher D.W., Shillingburg H.T. //J South Calif Dent Assoc, - 1969, -P.444-449.
    • Hamilton A.I. Porcelain dowel crowns. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1959, P.639-644.
    • Larato D.C. Single unit cast post crown for pulpless anterior tooth roots. // J rosthet Dent, - 1966,P.145-149.
    • Christy J.M. Fabrication of a dual-post veneer crown. / D.J.Pipko // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1967, P.1419-1425.
    • Bartlett  S.O. Construction of detached core crowns for pulpless teeth in only two sittings // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1968, P.843-845.
    • Burnell S.C. Improved cast dowel and base for restoring endodontically treated teeth. // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1964, P.39-45.
    • Perel M.L. Clinical criteria for post and cores / Muroff F.l. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1972, P.405-411.
    • Stem N. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations / Z. Hirshfeld // J Prosthet Dent, - 1973, P.162-165.
    • Hirshfeld Z. Post and core — the biomechanical aspect. / N.Stem // Aust Dent J, - 1972,P.467-468.
    • Henry P.J. Photoelastic analysis of post core restorations. // Aust Dent J, -1977, P.157-159.
    • Standlee J.P. Retention of endodontic dowels: effect of cement, dowel length and design. / M.Caputo, E.C.Hanson // J Prosthet Dent, - 1978, P.400-405.
    • Leary J.M. An evaluation of post length within the elastic limits of dentin./ S.A.Aquilino, C.W.Svare // J Prosthet Dent, - 1987, P.277-281.
    • Weine F.S. Endodontic therapy. // 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, -1989, P.756-766.
    • Sorensen J.A., Clinically significant factors in dowel design. / J.T.Martinoff // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.28-34.
    • Barkmeier W.W. Amalgam restoration of poste­rior teeth before endodontic treatment. / J.R.Murrin, R.W. Anderson // J Endodont, - 1980, P.446-449.
    • Hunter A.J. Effects of post placement on endodonti-cally treated teeth. / B. Feiglin, J.F. Williams // J Prosthet Dent, - 1989, P.166-172.
    • Standlee J.P. The retentive and stress-distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. / M.Caputo, J. Holcomb, K.C. Trabert // J Prosthet Dent, - 1980, P.398-404.
    • Goodacre C.J. The prosthodontic management of endodonti-cally treated teeth: a literature review. Part lilt tooth preparation consider­ations. / K.J. Spolnik // J Prosthodont, - 1995, P.122-128.
    • Abou-Rass M. Preparation of space for posting: effect on thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars. / J.M.Jann, D.Jobe, F. Tsutsui. // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1982, P.834-837.
    • Tilk M.A. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. / T.J.Lommel, H. Gerstein // J Endod, - 1979, P.79-82.
    • Colley I.T. Retention of post crowns. An assess­ment of the relative efficiency of posts of different shapes and sizes. / E.L.Hampson, M.L.Lehman  // Br Dent J, - 1968, P.63-69.
    • Johnson J.K. Dowel form and tensile force. / J.S. Sakamura // J Prosthet Dent, - 1978, P.645-649.
    • Cooney J.P. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. / M. Caputo, K.C. Trabert // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.540-546.
    • Craig R.G.  Stress analysis and design of single restorations and fixed bridges. / J.W. Farah // Oral Sci Rev, - 1977, P.45-74.
    • Ross R.S. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. / J.I.Nicholls, G.W. Harrington // J Endodont, - 1991, P.450-456.
    • Zmener O. Adaptation of threaded dowels to dentin. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1980, P.530-535.
    • Bums D.A. Stress distribution sur­rounding endodontic posts. / W.R. Krause., H.B.Douglas, D.R.Bums // J Prosthet Dent, - 1990, P.412-418.
    • Standlee J.P. Analysis of stress distri­bution by endodontic posts. / M. Caputo, E.W.Collard, M.H. Pollack // Oral Surg, - 1972, P.952-960.
    • Standlee J.P. The Dentatus screw: comparative stress analysis with other endodontic dowel designs. / M.Caputo, J.P. Holcomb // J Oral Rehabil, - 1982, P.23-33.
    • Hudis S.I. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. / G.R. Goldstein // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.33-38.
    • Ruemping D.R. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. / M.R.Lund, R.J.Schnell // J Prosthet Dent, - 1979, P.159-162.
    • Sorensen J.A. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. / M.J.Engelman // J Prosthet Dent, - 1990, P.419-424.
    • Stockton L.W. Retention and shear bond strength of two post systems. / P.T.Williams // Oper Dent.-1999, P. 34-39.
    • Krupp J.D. Dowel retention with glass-ionomer cement. / Caputo M., K.C.Trabert, J.P. Standlee // J Prosthet Dent, - 1979, P.163-166.
    • Goldman M. An SEM study of posts cemented with an unfilled resin. / R.DeVitre, W R.hite, D.Nathanson // J Dent Res, - 1984, P.1003-1005.
    • Chapman K.W. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. / Worley J.L., von Fraunhofer J.A.// J Prosthet Dent, - 1985, P.649-652.
    • Young H.M. Retention of cast posts relative to cement selection. / C.Shen, G.A. Maryniuk // Quintessence Int, - 1985, P.357-360.
    • Ben-Amar A. Retention of pre­fabricated posts with dental adhesive and composite. / G.Gontar, S.Fitzig, M.Urstein, R.Liberman // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.681-684.
    • Gontar G. Retention of dowels using Conclude composite resin as a luting medium. / R.Liberman, M. Urstein, S.Fitzig, Ben-Amar A. // Dent Mater, - 1986, P.118-120.
    • Hill G.L. Retention of etched base metal dowels with resin cement and bonding agent. / O.Zidan, L. Duerst // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.691-693.
    • Nasar H.H. The luting efficacy of cements in bonding dowels of different metals. / Eskander M.E., Zake A.M.// Egypt Dent J, - 1987, P.155-171.
    • Brown J.D. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. / J.C.Mitchem // Oper Dent, - 1987,P.15-19.
    • Tjan A.H. Effects of various cementation methods on the retention of prefabricated posts. / A.H.Tjan, J.H.Greive // J Prosthet Dent, - 1987, P.309-313.
    • Chapman K.W. Effect of bonding agents on retention of posts. / J.L.Worley, J.A. von Fraunhofer // Gen Dent, - 1985, P.128-130.
    • Goldman M.  Effect of the dentin smeared layer on ten­sile strength of cemented posts. / R. DeVitre, M.Pier // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.485-488.
    • Radke R.A. Retention of cast endodontic posts: comparison of cementing agents. / R.A.Barkhordar, R.E. Podesta // J Prosthet Dent, - 1988, P.318-320.
    • Coleman R.A. Dentin bonded post and cores: An in vitro failure analysis./ J.F.Corcoran, J.M.Powers, K.M.Sloan, R.E.Lorey, S.A.  LaTurno // J Dent Res, - 1987, P.135-138.
    • Wolff M.S. A comparison of three cements in retaining posts in teeth. / J.Breuer, A.Shiu, J.W. Osborne // J Dent Res, - 1987,P. 139-140.
    • Schwartz R.S. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. // 1st ed. London: Quin­tessence Publishing, - 1996, P.325.
    • Goldstein G.R. Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts. / S.I.Hudis, D.E.Weintraub // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.209-211.
    • Mendoza D.B. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. / W.S.Eakle, E.A.Kahl, R.Ho // J Prosthet Dent, - 1997, P.10-14.
    • Goldman M. Cement distribution and bond strength in cemented posts. / R.DeVitre, J. Tenca // J Dent Res, - 1984, P.1392-1395.
    • Kwan E.H. The effect of immediate post preparation on apical seal./G.W.Harrington//J.Endodont.-1981.- P.325-329.
    • Mattison G.D. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. / P.D.Delivanis, R.W. Thacker K.J.Hassell // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.785-789.
    • Madison S. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leak­age in teeth prepared for posts. / Zakariasen K.L. // J Endod, - 1984, P.422-447.
    • Suchina J.A. Dowel space preparation and the apical seal. / J.R.Ludington // J Endod, - 1985, P.11-17.
    • Dickey D.J. Effect of post space preparation on apical seal using solvent techniques and Peeso reamers. / G.Z.Harris, R.R.Lemon, R.G.Luebke // J Endod, - 1982, P.351-354.
    • Kvist T. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal-retained posts. / E.Rydin, C. Reit // J Endodont, - 1989, P.578-580.
    • Kantor M.E. A comparative study of restorative techniques for pulpless teeth. / M.S. Pines // J Prosthet Dent, - 1977, P.405-412.
    • Lovdahl P.E. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel cores. / Nicholls J.I.// J Prosthet Dent, - 1977, P.507-514.
    • Nayyar A.G. An amalgam coronal-radicular doweland core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. / R.E.Walton, L.A. Leonard // J Prosthet Dent, - 1980, P.511-515.
    • Christian G.W. Post core restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth. / G.L.Button, P.C.Moon, M.C.England, H.B.Douglas // J  Endodont, - 1981, P.182-185.
    • Wood W.W. Retention of posts in teeth with nonvital pulps. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1983, P.504-506.
    • Caputo M. Pins and posts—why, when and how. / J.P.Standlee // Dent Clin North Am, - 1976,P.299-331.
    • Brandal J.L. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth. / J.I.Nicholls, G.W.Harrington // J Prosthet Dent,- 1987, P.161-165.
    • Sorensen J.A. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal cover-age: a study of endodontically treated teeth. / J.T. Martinoff // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.780-784.
    • Weine F.S. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. / A.H.Wax, C.S. Wenckus // J Endod, - 1991, P.293-297.
    Publication of the article «World of Medicine and Biology» №3(26), 2010 year, 134-140 pages, index UDK 616.314-76:615