FEATURES OF HAEMODINAMIC PARAMETRES OF PATIENTS WITH CHOLELITHYASIS BY ILLNESS AT SIMULTANEOUS OPERATIONS
Clinical medicine

FEATURES OF HAEMODINAMIC PARAMETRES OF PATIENTS WITH CHOLELITHYASIS BY ILLNESS AT SIMULTANEOUS OPERATIONS

Published 2010-12-22

Authors:

Аль Ширафі Мохаммед Авад

Abstract:
In 42 patients cholecystectomi is executed by the opened access and in 299 – executed a laparoscopic method. Probed the indexes of hemodynamics in the day of operation, on 1 – 3 and 5 days after operative interference. It is set that laparoscopic method and traditional single-plane operations at patients from accompanied cholelithyasis illness by disorders of hemodynamics. A laparoscopic method has considerable advantages in a after operation period, namely: a pulse, systole, diastole and middle arteriotony, and also frequency of respiratory motions, during the leadthrough of laparoscopic operative interferences settled into a shape on the third days. While at traditional access to the organs of abdominal region these parameters were normalized, in swingeing majority on the fifth days of after operation period.
Keywords:
simultantion of operation cholelithyasis by illness
References:
  1. Александров Л.С., Ищенко А.И., Ведерникова Н.В. Некоторые особенности хирургического стресса при изолированных симультанных эндоскопических операциях .// Новые технологии в гинекологии./Под ред.акад. РАМН д.м.н., проф.Кулакова В.Н., член-корр. РАМН, д.м.н., проф. Адамян Л.В. - Москва: Пантори.-2003.- С – 172.
  2. Бурков С.Г. Желчнокаменная болезнь (эпидемиология, патогенез, клиника) / С.Г. Бурков, Ф.И.,Комаров А.Л. Гребенев // Руководство по гастро­энтерологии. - М.: Медицина, 1995. - Т.2 - С. 417-442.
  3. Андреев Ю.В. Факторы риска осложнений при симультанных операциях на органах брюшной полости.: Дис . канд. мед. наук. -Петрозаводск, 2000., 131с.
  4. Гельман В.Я. Медицинская информатика: практикум / Гельман В.Я. - СПб: Питер, 2001.-480 с.
  5. Лапач Н.С. Применение современных методов математической статистики при анализе результатов клинических испытаний / Н.С. Лапач, А.В. Чубенко. Вісник фармакології та фармації – 2004. - №7. – С. 11-25.
  6. Baxter J. Pathophysiology of laparoscopy / Baxter J. – Br. J. Surg. – 1995. – Vol. 82. – P. 1-2.
  7. Beebe D.S. Evidence of venous stasis afterabdominal insffation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy / Beebe D.S., Me Mevin M.P., Bellani K.G. – Anaesthesiology. – 1993. – Vol. 77. – P. 140 – 148.
  8. Philips P.A. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy // Proceedings of the Scientific Session of the American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 29 March-1 April 2000 / P.A. Philips, J.F. Amaral // Surgical Endoscopy. – 2000; 14 (Supplement 1): 211.
  9. Shaffer E.A. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? / E.A. Shaffer // Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. - 2005. - Vol. 7, N.2.-P. 132-140.
  10. Somasekar K. Costs of waiting for.gall bladder surgery / K. Somasekar , P.J. Shankar, M.E. Foster // Postgrad. Med. J. - 2002. - Vol. 78, N.925. - P. 668-669.
Publication:
«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 7 No. 28 (2011) , с. 58-61
УДК 616- 001- 002-084