English Українська
  • Main
  • Useful links
  • Information for Contributors
  • About
  • Editorial board

  • Article
    D.M. Ivashchenko, M.O. Dudchenko, M.I. Kravtsiv

    EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF APPLICATION OF CONTACT LITHOTRIPSY IN LARGE OCCLUSING URETERAL STONES


    About the author: D.M. Ivashchenko, M.O. Dudchenko, M.I. Kravtsiv
    Heading CLINICAL MEDICINE
    Type of article Scentific article
    Annotation The study was devoted to the analysis of the effectiveness of contact lithotripsy and its comparison with the effectiveness of extracorporeal lithotripsy in patients with large (> 10 mm) ureteral calculi, accompanied by urinary tract obstruction. We also analyzed a group of patients who underwent lithotripsy in 2 surgical stages with preliminary stenting of the urinary tract. According to the results of the study, a shorter duration of pain syndrome and hematuria was noted in patients who underwent contact lithotripsy and achieved “stone free” state, compared with distance lithotripsy. When comparing the group's indicators with preliminary stenting of the ureters, it was noted that the duration of hematuria was shorter on average by 12%, pain syndrome was shorter on average by 16%. So, contact lithotripsy as a method of management of large urinary tract stones can be recommended as a 1st level therapy in the absence of contraindications to surgical treatment.
    Tags Contact lithotripsy, ureteral calculi, renal colic
    Bibliography
    • Sarychev LP, Sukhomlyn SA, Sarychev YaV, Minimalno invazyvne rozblokuvannia nyrky u khvorykh na sechokamyanu khvorobu uskladnenu obstruktsiyeyu verkhnikh sechovykh shliakhiv. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. 2011; 40:232–34 [in Ukrainian]
    • Elmansy HE, Lingeman JE. Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update. Int J Surg. 2016; 36(Pt D):676-80
    • Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2:16008.
    • Knudsen BE, Beiko DT, Denstedt JD. Stenting after ureteroscopy: pros and cons. Urol Clin North Am. 2004; 31:173–180
    • Samad EJ, Hassan S., Farzad R., Nahid Z. M., Saeid S., Yaghoub H. Therapeutic Approaches for Renal Colic in the Emergency Department: A Review Article. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Feb; 4(1): e16222.
    • Tundo G, Khaleel S, Pais VM., Jr Gender equivalence in the prevalence of nephrolithiasis among adults younger than 50 years in the United States. J Urol 2018; 200:1273–7       
    • Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016; 69:475-82.
    • Wu T, Duan X, Chen S, et al. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 2017; 99:308–19
    • Yaxuan W., Xueliang C., Jingdong Li, Zhenwei H. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec; 46(6): 902–926
    Publication of the article «World of Medicine and Biology» №4(74), 2020 year, 59-63 pages, index UDK 616.643-071-085
    DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2020-4-74-59-63