| About the author: |
V. D. Kuroiedova, Ye. Ye. Vyzhenko, О. А. Stasiuk, Yu. К. Sokolohorska-Nykina, А. V. Petrova |
| Heading |
CLINICAL MEDICINE |
| Type of article |
Scentific article |
| Annotation |
The article highlights the results of research on the differential diagnosis of skeletal forms in distal occlusion. Distal occlusion is the most common anomaly of the dental system after Angle class I occlusion pathologies and ranges from 38 % to 65 %. The clinical method was to examine patients with Angle class II dental anomalies. The radiological method consisted of the study of lateral cephalograms of patients with the software “AudaxCeph”. Nine forms of prognostic distal occlusion have been identified based on cephalometric studies. Among all forms, the most common is maxillary prognathism 35.59 %. The values of cephalometric parameters required for the diagnosis of prognostic distal occlusion are essential for clarifying the form of dental anomaly and permit to detail skeletal forms. |
| Tags |
dental anomaly, upper jaw, lower jaw, prognathism, distal occlusion |
| Bibliography |
- Doroshenko SI, Kulginskiy EA, Radchenko AV, Storozhenko KV. Differentsialnaya dіagnostika prognaticheskikh form prikusa. Sovremennaya ortodontiya. 2012; 02(28): 4–9 [in Russian]
- Hassan AH. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2011; 23 (1): 23–27.
- Joshia N, Hamdanb AM, Fakhouric WD. Skeletal Malocclusion: A Developmental Disorder With a Life-Long Morbidity. J Clin Med Res. 2014; 6(6): 399–408.
- Krishna A., Babu LJ. Rush run on the classification system of class ІІ malocclusion Med. Res. Chronicles. 2019; 6(5): 241–248.
- Moreno Uribe LM, Howe SC, Kummet C, Vela KC, Dawson DV, Southard TE, et al. Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145:305–16.
- Perović T. The Influence of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions on the Harmony of the Human Face Profile. Med Sci Monit. 2017; 23: 5589–5598.
- Santos RL, Ruellas ACO. Dentofacial characteristics of patients with Angle Class I and Class II malocclusions. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012; 17(2): 1–7.
- Stasiuk OA, Vyzhenko YеYе, Makarova AN, Kuroуedova VD, Sokolohorska-Nykina YK. The evaluation of heads of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) position in patients with malocclusion. The New Armenian Medical Journal. 2020; 14 (1): 48–54.
- Yoon SS, Chung C-H. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 147: 190–6. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.023.
- Zegan G, Dascălu CG, Golovcencu L, Anistoroaei D. Сephalometric features of class ІІ Мalocclusion. International Journal of Medical Dentistry. 2014; 4 (3): 222–228.
|
| Publication of the article |
«World of Medicine and Biology» №2(80), 2022 year, 099-102 pages, index UDK 616.314.25/.26-071 |
| DOI |
10.26724/2079-8334-2022-2-80-99-102 |
