English Українська
  • Main
  • Useful links
  • Information for Contributors
  • About
  • Editorial board

  • Article
    S. Yu. Karatieieva, O. M. Slobodian, L. P. Lavriv, K. V. Slobodian, N. Y. Muzyka

    DETERMINATION OF PROXIMAL THIGH CIRCUMFERENCE IN STUDENTS OF BUKOVINIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF SPORT


    About the author: S. Yu. Karatieieva, O. M. Slobodian, L. P. Lavriv, K. V. Slobodian, N. Y. Muzyka
    Heading CLINICAL MEDICINE
    Type of article Scentific article
    Annotation As a result of the anthropometric study of 115 students in the first and second years of higher education institutions in Chernivtsi, aged from 16 to 18 years, it was established that basketball players have the greatest length of the proximal circumference of the right thigh – 54.14±2.0 cm, of which 54.06±2.0 cm for boys and 54.08±2.0 cm for girls and volleyball players – 54.00±2.0 cm, of which 53.10±2.0 cm for boys and 53.90±2.0 cm for girls, slightly smaller in football players – 52.27±2.0 cm, of which 51.80±2.0 cm for boys and 52.47±2.0 cm for girls and the smallest tennis player – 48.80±2.0 cm, of which 48.10±2.0 cm for boys and 48.70±2.0 cm for girls. By comparison, volleyball players have the greatest proximal length of the left thigh circumference – 51.77±2.0 cm, of which 51.57±2.0 cm for boys and 51.20±2.0 cm for girls and basketball players – 50.00±2.0 cm, of which 50.20±2.0 cm for boys and 49.80±2.0 cm for girls, slightly smaller in football players – 48.07±2.0 cm, of which 48.05±2.0 cm for boys and 48.02±2.0 cm for girls and the smallest in tennis players – 45.70±2.0 cm, of which 45.45±2.0 cm for boys and 45.30±2.0 cm for girls.
    Tags students,antoropometric parameters,proximal thigh circumference
    Bibliography
    • Karatieieva SYu, Slobodian OM, Moseychuk YuYu, Lavriv LP, Baidiuk MYu, Goy RS. Osoblyvosti pokaznykiv ekskursiyi ohruddia v studentiv zakladiv vyshchoyi osvity. Klinichna anatomiya ta operatyvna khirurhiya. Chernivtsi. 2021; 20, 2 (76):14 –24. DOI: 10.24061/1727-0847.20.2.2021.14 [in Ukrainian]
    • Kotko DM, Honcharuk NL, Shevtsov SM. Zminy deiakykh antropometrychnykh pokaznykiv u sportsmeniv – lehkoatletiv na etapakh bahatorichnoi pidhotovky. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni N.P. Drahomanova. Kyiv. 2021; 3(133): 68–73. [in Ukrainian]
    • Shaparenko PF. Antropometriia. Vinnytsia: Drukarnia Vinnytskoho derzhavnoho medychnoho universytetu im. M.I. Pyrohova, 2000: 71 s. [in Ukrainian]
    • Aragon AA, Schoenfeld BJ, Wildman R, Kleiner S, Van Dusseldorp T, Taylor L, et.al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Jun 14;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12970-017-0174-y.
    • Cullen S, Fleming J, Logue DM, O'Connor J, Connor B, Cleary J. Anthropometric profiles of elite athletes. J of Human Sport & Exercise. 2020; 17 (1): 145–155. doi:10.14198/jhse.2022.171.14
    • Danielle L, Sharon M, Eamonn D, Miriam H, Sarah J, Clare A. Low Energy Availability in Athletes: A Review of Prevalence, Dietary Patterns, Physiological Health, and Sports Performance. Sports Medicine. 2018; 48 (1): 73–96. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0790-3.
    • Josu G, Nicholas T, Jon T, Cristina G, Jordan S. Anthropometric characteristics of top-class Olympic race walkers. J of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019; 59(3): 429–433. doi:10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08363-9.
    • Karatieieva SYu, Slobodian OM, HoncharHI, NazarevychVS, SlobodianKV, KorelianchukAV. Establishment of types of the constitutions in students-athletes and in students-medicists with their further analysis. Wiadomosti Lekarskie 2022; LXXV, 4(2):955–959. doi: 10.36740/WLek20220420106.
    • Kozina ZhL, Bazilyuk TA, Boyko AG. Analysis of the structure of the integrated preparedness of qualified handballers using multidimensional analysis methods. Health, sport, rehabilitation. 2017; 3(2): 15–24. doi:10.34142/zenodo.1109904.
    • Kristina L, David H, Parker N, Abbie E, Jordon R, Jeffrey R. Estimating fat-free mass in elite-level male rowers: a four-compartment model validation of laboratory and field methods. Journal of Sports Science. 2017; 35(7): 624–633 doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1183802.
    • Logue D, Madigan SM, Delahunt E, Heinen M, Mc Donnell SJ, Corish CA. Low Energy Availability in Athletes: A Review of Prevalence, Dietary Patterns, Physiological Health, and Sports Performance. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):73–96. PMID: 28983802. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0790-3.
    • Ratko Pavlović, Ilona Mihajlović, Nikola Radulović, Siniša Nikolić.Anthropometric parameters of elite male runners sprint: are body height and body weight good predictors of results. Health, sport, rehabilitation, 2022; 8(3): 64–74 doi: 10.34142/HSR.2022.08.03.05.
    • Sogokon OA, Donets OV, Donets IM.Functional state of cardiovascular and digestive systems in the body of students during fitness training. World of Medicine and Biology. 2020; 1 (71): 136‒141. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2020-1-71-136-141.
    • Thomas D, Erdman K, Burke L. American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2016; 48(3): 543–568 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852.
    • Vesnina LE. Boriak KhR, Sokolenko VM. Assesment of the dietary energy intake of young people with normal weight and overweight. World of Medicine and Biology. 2020;3 (73): 27–32. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2020-3-73-27-32.
    Publication of the article «World of Medicine and Biology» №4(82), 2022 year, 079-084 pages, index UDK 611.982.06-023.11-057.875:796
    DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2022-4-82-79-84