English Українська
  • Main
  • Useful links
  • Information for Contributors
  • About
  • Editorial board

  • Article
    Ye. A. Nesterenko, Yu. G. Shevchuk, М. М. Shinkaruk-Dykovytska, S. A. Lysenko, T. V. Chugu

    SIMULATION OF INDIVIDUAL TELERADIOGRAPHIC INDICATORS USING THE “CEPHALOMETRICS FOR ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY” METHOD IN UKRAINIAN YOUNG WOMEN WITH A VERY BROAD FACE TYPE


    About the author: Ye. A. Nesterenko, Yu. G. Shevchuk, М. М. Shinkaruk-Dykovytska, S. A. Lysenko, T. V. Chugu
    Heading CLINICAL MEDICINE
    Type of article Scentific article
    Annotation In the course of the study, in Ukrainian young women with an orthognathic bite and with a very wide face type, reliable regression models of teleroentgenometric indicators used in the “Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery” method were built and analyzed (all indicators were divided into 3 groups according to the method of Dmitriev M. O.). With a coefficient of determination higher than 0.6, out of 33 possible, 5 reliable indicator models were built, which were included in the second and third groups, depending on the indicators of the first group (R²= from 0.616 to 0.789), and out of 19 possible – 13 indicator models, which were included in the third group depending on the indicators of the first and second groups (R²= from 0.612 to 0.991).
    Tags regression models,teleradiography,cephalometry,COGS method,young women,face types,orthognathic occlusion
    Bibliography
    • Dmitriev МО. Zviazky osnovnykh kranialnykh pokaznykiv z kharakterystykamy polozhennia zubiv verkhnyoyi i nyzhnyoyi shchelep ta profilem miakykh tkanyn oblychchia v yunakiv i divchat. Visnyk morfolohiyi. 2017;23(1):125–31. [in Ukrainian]
    • Dmitriev МО. Koreliatsiyi osnovnykh kranialnykh pokaznykiv z kharakterystykamy verkhnyoyi ta nyzhnoyi shchelep u meshkantsiv Ukrainy yunatskoho viku. Svit medytsyny ta biolohiyi. 2016;4(58):24–9. [in Ukrainian]
    • Proffit UR, Fildz GU, Saver DM. (perev. s angl. DS. Persina). Sovremennaya ortodontiya. M.: MEDpress-inform, 2006. [in Russian]
    • Aljabaa AH. Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2019; 11:9–17. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S190230
    • Bhagat SK, Kannan S, Babu MR, Murugan kanagasabapathy T, Kumar Jain M, Ramesh C, Radha A. Soft tissue changes following combined anterior segmental bimaxillary orthognathic procedures. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2019; 18:93–9. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1099-y
    • Durão AR, Alqerban A, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The Angle Orthodontist. 2015;85(2):206–10. doi:10.2319/011214-41.1
    • Girhe V, Borle R, Datey P, Shirivastav S, Bhola N. Cephalometric norms for the north Indian population: A systematic review. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022;13(2):172–9. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_34_20
    • Helal NM, Basri OA, Baeshen HA. Significance of cephalometric radiograph in orthodontic treatment plan decision. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(7):789–93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2598
    • Ho TT, Luong QT. Dental-craniofacial characteristics of Southern Vietnamese people with well-balanced face on cephalometric films and its comparison with Caucasians and Northern Vietnamese population. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2021;11(3):316–23. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_13_21
    • Kuroiedova VD, Vyzhenko YY, Stasiuk ОА, Sokolohorska-Nykina YК, Petrova АV. Cephalometric characteristics of skeletal forms of distal bite. World of Medicine and Biology. 2022;18(80):099–102. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2022-2-80-99-102
    • Lyakhova NA. Analysis of risk factors of orthodontic pathology: literature review. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 2018;71(5):1084–8. PMID: 30176646
    • Nesterenko YA, Shinkaruk-Dykovytska ММ, Chugu TV, Dudik OP, Gunas VI. Determination of cephalometric parameters according to the COGS method, which characterize the position of individual teeth relative to cranial structures depending on the types of faces in Ukrainian young men and young women with an orthognathic bite. Reports of Morphology. 2022;28(3):32–7. doi: 10.31393/morphology-journal-2022-28(3)-05
    • Ryabov TV. Relationship of odontometric and cephalometric indicators. Review of literary sources. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University. 2022;26(4):687–91. doi: 10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2022-26(4)-29
    • Silva MB, Sant'Anna EF. The evolution of cephalometric diagnosis in orthodontics. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2013; 18:63–71. doi: 10.1590/S2176-94512013000300011
    • Singh R, Awasthy A, Krishna BP, Mazhar H, Soni SK, Thomas AE. Do We Vary from Caucasians! Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery in Chhattisgarhi Population. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2021:1237–43. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01559-4
    Publication of the article «World of Medicine and Biology» №2(84), 2023 year, 119-123 pages, index UDK 616.714.1-071.3(477)
    DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2023-2-84-119-123