РусскийEnglishУкраїнська
  • Главная
  • Полезные ссылки
  • О журнале
  • Авторам
  • Редакционная коллегия

  • Статья
    Д.Р. Шиленко, Р.В. Шиленко, М.И. Кривда, И.Н. Рогов

    ИНДИВИДУАЛЬНЫЙ ПОДБОР ШТИФТОВОЙ СИСТЕМЫ В ЗАВИСИМОСТИ ОТ КЛИНИЧЕСКОЙ СИТУАЦИИ


    Об авторе: Д.Р. Шиленко, Р.В. Шиленко, М.И. Кривда, И.Н. Рогов
    Рубрика ОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
    Тип статьи Обзорная статья
    Аннотация Надежность фиксации и устойчивость к перелому являются 2 важнейшими факторами, которые необходимо учитывать при установке штифтовых систем. Однако, надежность фиксации зачастую пропорциональна объему удаленных тканей, что может сильно ослабить корень зуба. Размещая штифт, врач-стоматолог должен оценить каждый зуб индивидуально, ¬чтобы получить максимальное сопротивление перелому. Поскольку ни одна система не может считаться полностью универсальной ее выбор ложится на плечи врача.
    Ключевые слова штифтовые системы, индивидуальный подбор.
    Список цитируемой литературы
    • Morgano S.M. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional prin­ciples in present and future contexts// J Prosthet Dent, - 1996, P.75-80.
    • · Abou-Rass M. Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth. // Curr Opin Dent, - 1992, P.99-107.
    • · Sorensen J.A. Preservation of tooth structure.// J Calif Dent Assoc, - 1988, P.15-22.
    • · Guzy G.E. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement / J.I. Nicholls //J Prosthet Dent, - 1979, С.39-44.
    • · Trope M. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth/ D.O. Maltz, L.Tronstad //Endod Dent Traumatol, - 1985, P.108-11.
    • · Sidoli N.G. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system./ P.A.King, D.J. Setchell // J Prosthet Dent, - 1997, P. 5-9.
    • · Hock D. Impact resistance of post and cores// Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Dentistry; 1976, P.23-25
    • · Mattison G.D. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast-gold endodontic posts // J Prosthet Dent, - 1982, P.407-411.
    • · Tjan A.H. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. / S.Whang //J Prosthet Dent, - 1985, P.496-500.
    • Trabert K.C. Tooth fracture — a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. / A.A.Caputo, M.Abou-Rass // J Endod, - 1978, P.341-345
    • Milot P. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design./ R.S. Stein // J Prosthet Dent, - 1992, P.428-435.
    • Burgess J.O. The resistance to tensile, compres­sion, and torsional forces provided by four post systems./ J.B.Summitt, J.W. Robbins // J Prosthet Dent, -1992, P.899-903.
    • Roberts D.H. The failure of retainers in bridge prostheses. An analysis of 2000 retainers. // Br Dent J, - 1970, P.117-124.
    • Mentink A. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration./ R.Meeuwissen, A . Kayser, J.Mulder // J Oral Rehabil1, - 1993, P.455-461.
    • Lewis R. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. / B.G. Smith // BrDent J, - 1988, P.95-97.
    • Hopwood W.A. Clinical assessment of a split-shank post system in permanent molar and premolar teeth./ N.H.Wilson // Quintessence Int, - 1990, P.907-911.
    • Torbjorner A, Survival rate and failure character­istics for two post designs./ S. Karlsson, P.A. Odman //J Prosthet Dent, - 1995,P.439-444.
    • Harper R.H. Treatment of the pulpless tooth during post and core construction. / M.R. Lund // Oper Dent, - 1976, P.55-60.
    • Mondelli J An acrylic resin pattern for a cast doweland core. / A.C.Piccino, A. Berbert //J Prosthet Dent, - 1971, P.413-417.
    • Pickard H.M. Variants of the post crown. // Br Dent J, - 1964, P.517-526.
    • Blaukopf E.R. Direct acrylic Davis crown technic.// J Am Dent Assoc, - 1944, P.544-550.
    • Baraban D.J. The restoration of pulpless teeth.// Dent Clin North Am, - 1967, P.633-653.
    • Jacoby W.E. Jr. Practical technique for the fabrication of a direct pattern for a post-core restoration // J Prosthet Dent, - 1976, P.357-360.
    • Dewhirst R.B. Jr. Dowel-core fabrication. / Fisher D.W., Shillingburg H.T. //J South Calif Dent Assoc, - 1969, -P.444-449.
    • Hamilton A.I. Porcelain dowel crowns. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1959, P.639-644.
    • Larato D.C. Single unit cast post crown for pulpless anterior tooth roots. // J rosthet Dent, - 1966,P.145-149.
    • Christy J.M. Fabrication of a dual-post veneer crown. / D.J.Pipko // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1967, P.1419-1425.
    • Bartlett  S.O. Construction of detached core crowns for pulpless teeth in only two sittings // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1968, P.843-845.
    • Burnell S.C. Improved cast dowel and base for restoring endodontically treated teeth. // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1964, P.39-45.
    • Perel M.L. Clinical criteria for post and cores / Muroff F.l. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1972, P.405-411.
    • Stem N. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations / Z. Hirshfeld // J Prosthet Dent, - 1973, P.162-165.
    • Hirshfeld Z. Post and core — the biomechanical aspect. / N.Stem // Aust Dent J, - 1972,P.467-468.
    • Henry P.J. Photoelastic analysis of post core restorations. // Aust Dent J, -1977, P.157-159.
    • Standlee J.P. Retention of endodontic dowels: effect of cement, dowel length and design. / M.Caputo, E.C.Hanson // J Prosthet Dent, - 1978, P.400-405.
    • Leary J.M. An evaluation of post length within the elastic limits of dentin./ S.A.Aquilino, C.W.Svare // J Prosthet Dent, - 1987, P.277-281.
    • Weine F.S. Endodontic therapy. // 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, -1989, P.756-766.
    • Sorensen J.A., Clinically significant factors in dowel design. / J.T.Martinoff // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.28-34.
    • Barkmeier W.W. Amalgam restoration of poste­rior teeth before endodontic treatment. / J.R.Murrin, R.W. Anderson // J Endodont, - 1980, P.446-449.
    • Hunter A.J. Effects of post placement on endodonti-cally treated teeth. / B. Feiglin, J.F. Williams // J Prosthet Dent, - 1989, P.166-172.
    • Standlee J.P. The retentive and stress-distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. / M.Caputo, J. Holcomb, K.C. Trabert // J Prosthet Dent, - 1980, P.398-404.
    • Goodacre C.J. The prosthodontic management of endodonti-cally treated teeth: a literature review. Part lilt tooth preparation consider­ations. / K.J. Spolnik // J Prosthodont, - 1995, P.122-128.
    • Abou-Rass M. Preparation of space for posting: effect on thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars. / J.M.Jann, D.Jobe, F. Tsutsui. // J Am Dent Assoc, - 1982, P.834-837.
    • Tilk M.A. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. / T.J.Lommel, H. Gerstein // J Endod, - 1979, P.79-82.
    • Colley I.T. Retention of post crowns. An assess­ment of the relative efficiency of posts of different shapes and sizes. / E.L.Hampson, M.L.Lehman  // Br Dent J, - 1968, P.63-69.
    • Johnson J.K. Dowel form and tensile force. / J.S. Sakamura // J Prosthet Dent, - 1978, P.645-649.
    • Cooney J.P. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. / M. Caputo, K.C. Trabert // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.540-546.
    • Craig R.G.  Stress analysis and design of single restorations and fixed bridges. / J.W. Farah // Oral Sci Rev, - 1977, P.45-74.
    • Ross R.S. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. / J.I.Nicholls, G.W. Harrington // J Endodont, - 1991, P.450-456.
    • Zmener O. Adaptation of threaded dowels to dentin. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1980, P.530-535.
    • Bums D.A. Stress distribution sur­rounding endodontic posts. / W.R. Krause., H.B.Douglas, D.R.Bums // J Prosthet Dent, - 1990, P.412-418.
    • Standlee J.P. Analysis of stress distri­bution by endodontic posts. / M. Caputo, E.W.Collard, M.H. Pollack // Oral Surg, - 1972, P.952-960.
    • Standlee J.P. The Dentatus screw: comparative stress analysis with other endodontic dowel designs. / M.Caputo, J.P. Holcomb // J Oral Rehabil, - 1982, P.23-33.
    • Hudis S.I. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. / G.R. Goldstein // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.33-38.
    • Ruemping D.R. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. / M.R.Lund, R.J.Schnell // J Prosthet Dent, - 1979, P.159-162.
    • Sorensen J.A. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. / M.J.Engelman // J Prosthet Dent, - 1990, P.419-424.
    • Stockton L.W. Retention and shear bond strength of two post systems. / P.T.Williams // Oper Dent.-1999, P. 34-39.
    • Krupp J.D. Dowel retention with glass-ionomer cement. / Caputo M., K.C.Trabert, J.P. Standlee // J Prosthet Dent, - 1979, P.163-166.
    • Goldman M. An SEM study of posts cemented with an unfilled resin. / R.DeVitre, W R.hite, D.Nathanson // J Dent Res, - 1984, P.1003-1005.
    • Chapman K.W. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. / Worley J.L., von Fraunhofer J.A.// J Prosthet Dent, - 1985, P.649-652.
    • Young H.M. Retention of cast posts relative to cement selection. / C.Shen, G.A. Maryniuk // Quintessence Int, - 1985, P.357-360.
    • Ben-Amar A. Retention of pre­fabricated posts with dental adhesive and composite. / G.Gontar, S.Fitzig, M.Urstein, R.Liberman // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.681-684.
    • Gontar G. Retention of dowels using Conclude composite resin as a luting medium. / R.Liberman, M. Urstein, S.Fitzig, Ben-Amar A. // Dent Mater, - 1986, P.118-120.
    • Hill G.L. Retention of etched base metal dowels with resin cement and bonding agent. / O.Zidan, L. Duerst // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.691-693.
    • Nasar H.H. The luting efficacy of cements in bonding dowels of different metals. / Eskander M.E., Zake A.M.// Egypt Dent J, - 1987, P.155-171.
    • Brown J.D. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. / J.C.Mitchem // Oper Dent, - 1987,P.15-19.
    • Tjan A.H. Effects of various cementation methods on the retention of prefabricated posts. / A.H.Tjan, J.H.Greive // J Prosthet Dent, - 1987, P.309-313.
    • Chapman K.W. Effect of bonding agents on retention of posts. / J.L.Worley, J.A. von Fraunhofer // Gen Dent, - 1985, P.128-130.
    • Goldman M.  Effect of the dentin smeared layer on ten­sile strength of cemented posts. / R. DeVitre, M.Pier // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.485-488.
    • Radke R.A. Retention of cast endodontic posts: comparison of cementing agents. / R.A.Barkhordar, R.E. Podesta // J Prosthet Dent, - 1988, P.318-320.
    • Coleman R.A. Dentin bonded post and cores: An in vitro failure analysis./ J.F.Corcoran, J.M.Powers, K.M.Sloan, R.E.Lorey, S.A.  LaTurno // J Dent Res, - 1987, P.135-138.
    • Wolff M.S. A comparison of three cements in retaining posts in teeth. / J.Breuer, A.Shiu, J.W. Osborne // J Dent Res, - 1987,P. 139-140.
    • Schwartz R.S. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. // 1st ed. London: Quin­tessence Publishing, - 1996, P.325.
    • Goldstein G.R. Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts. / S.I.Hudis, D.E.Weintraub // J Prosthet Dent, - 1986, P.209-211.
    • Mendoza D.B. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. / W.S.Eakle, E.A.Kahl, R.Ho // J Prosthet Dent, - 1997, P.10-14.
    • Goldman M. Cement distribution and bond strength in cemented posts. / R.DeVitre, J. Tenca // J Dent Res, - 1984, P.1392-1395.
    • Kwan E.H. The effect of immediate post preparation on apical seal./G.W.Harrington//J.Endodont.-1981.- P.325-329.
    • Mattison G.D. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. / P.D.Delivanis, R.W. Thacker K.J.Hassell // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.785-789.
    • Madison S. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leak­age in teeth prepared for posts. / Zakariasen K.L. // J Endod, - 1984, P.422-447.
    • Suchina J.A. Dowel space preparation and the apical seal. / J.R.Ludington // J Endod, - 1985, P.11-17.
    • Dickey D.J. Effect of post space preparation on apical seal using solvent techniques and Peeso reamers. / G.Z.Harris, R.R.Lemon, R.G.Luebke // J Endod, - 1982, P.351-354.
    • Kvist T. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal-retained posts. / E.Rydin, C. Reit // J Endodont, - 1989, P.578-580.
    • Kantor M.E. A comparative study of restorative techniques for pulpless teeth. / M.S. Pines // J Prosthet Dent, - 1977, P.405-412.
    • Lovdahl P.E. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel cores. / Nicholls J.I.// J Prosthet Dent, - 1977, P.507-514.
    • Nayyar A.G. An amalgam coronal-radicular doweland core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. / R.E.Walton, L.A. Leonard // J Prosthet Dent, - 1980, P.511-515.
    • Christian G.W. Post core restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth. / G.L.Button, P.C.Moon, M.C.England, H.B.Douglas // J  Endodont, - 1981, P.182-185.
    • Wood W.W. Retention of posts in teeth with nonvital pulps. // J Prosthet Dent, - 1983, P.504-506.
    • Caputo M. Pins and posts—why, when and how. / J.P.Standlee // Dent Clin North Am, - 1976,P.299-331.
    • Brandal J.L. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth. / J.I.Nicholls, G.W.Harrington // J Prosthet Dent,- 1987, P.161-165.
    • Sorensen J.A. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal cover-age: a study of endodontically treated teeth. / J.T. Martinoff // J Prosthet Dent, - 1984, P.780-784.
    • Weine F.S. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. / A.H.Wax, C.S. Wenckus // J Endod, - 1991, P.293-297.
    Публикация статьи «Мир Медицины и Биологии» №3(26), 2010 год, 134-140 страницы, код УДК 616.314-76:615