COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RECTUS FEMORIS MUSCLE OF THE HIP ACCORDING TO THE DATA OF THE ULTRASOUND STUDY

Authors:

Abstract:

The study was performed on 48 young men aged 16 to 18. The main group consists of 32 respondents, the control group – of 16 students. All respondents underwent a morphometric study using ultrasound diagnostics of the rectus femoris muscle. As a result of the comparison of the morphometric parameters of the bipinnate (rectus) femoris muscle according to the ultrasound examination, it was established that the volume in the upper third of the m.réctus fémoris is greater in professional football players, compared to student football players, by 31.2 %, by 37.6 %, compared to the control group. Also, in football students the volume of m.réctus fémoris in the upper third is by 9.4 % larger, compared to the control group. In the middle third, it is higher in professional football players by 39.3 % compared to student football players and by 35.4 % compared to the control group. In the lower third, it is higher in professional football players by 28.1 %, compared to student football players, and by 21.1 %, compared to the control group. There is practically no difference in the volume of the m.réctus fémoris in the middle and lower third between football students and the control group.

Keywords:

muscles anatomy morphometry ultrasound examination

References:

1. Haiovych V.V. Osoblyvosti strukturnykh zmin skeletnykh miaziv kintsivok pry tryvalii denervatsii v eksperymenti. Visnyk ortopedii, travmatolohii ta protezuvannia. 2014; 4: 42–46. [in Ukrainian]
2. Klymovytskyi R.V. Kliniko-biomekhanichne obgruntuvannia ta pobudovani modeli roboty myshi, shcho zabezpechuiut horyzontalne rivnovahu taza Travma. 2017;18 (5): 13–19. doi:10.22141/1608-1706.5.18.2017.114115 [in Ukrainian]
3. Ezeiza J, Tam N, Torres-Unda J, Granados C, Santos-Concejero J. Anthropometric characteristics of top-class Olympic race walkers. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019; 59(3): 429–433. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08363-9
4. Gardasevic J, Bjelica1 D, Vasiljevic I, Corluka M, Arifi F, Sermaxhaj S. Morphological Characteristics and Body Composition of the Winners of the Soccer Cup of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. Sport Mont 2020;18 (1): 103–105. doi: 10.26773/smj.200219
5. Gusic M, Popovic S, Masanovic B, Radakovic M. Sport-specific morphology profile: differences in anthropometric characteristics among elite soccer and handball players. Sport Mont 2017; 15 (1): 3–6. http://www.sportmont.ucg.ac.me/clanci/SM_februar_2017_Gusic.pdf
6. Hyka A, Bicoku E, Mysliu A, Cuka A. The Association of Sprint Performance with Anthropometric Parameters in Youth Soccer Players. Sport Mont. 2017; 15 (1): 31–33. http://www.sportmont.ucg.ac.me/clanci/SM_februar_2017_Hyka.pdf
7. Karatieieva S, Slobodian O, Lukashiv T, Honchar H, Komar V, Kozlovska S. The determination of distal hip circumference in universities students depending on the sport type. Health, sport, rehabilitation. 2022; 8(3): 27–37 doi: https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2022.08.03.02
8. Kendall K, Fukada D, Hyde P, Smith-Ryan A, Moon J, Stout J. Estimating fat-free mass in elite-level male rowers: a four-compartment model validation of laboratory and field methods. Journal of Sports Science. 2017; 35(7): 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1183802
9. Kerr A, Slater G. Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes. 2017; British Journal of Nutrition. 117; 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517000551
10. Masanovic B, Bavcevic T, Bavcevic I. Comparative Study of Anthropometric Measurement and Body Composition between Junior Soccer and Volleyball Players from the Serbian National League. Sport Mont 2019; 17 (1): 9–14. doi: 10.26773/smj.190202
11. Pavlović R, Mihajlović I, Radulović N, Nikolić S.Anthropometric parameters of elite male runners sprint: are body height and body weight good predictors of results. Health, sport, rehabilitation, 2022; 8(3): 64–74 doi: https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2022.08.03.05
12. Thomas D, Erdman K, Burke L. American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2016; 48(3); 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852
13. Vujkov S, Casals C, Krneta Z, Drid P. Ultra short-term heart rate recovery after maximal exercise in two different body positions in elite male judokas compared to students of the sport faculty. Sport Mont. 2016; 14 (1): 7–11. http://www.sportmont.ucg.ac.me/clanci/SM_feb_2016_Vujkov.pdf
14. Wakahara T, Ema R, Miyamoto N, Kawakami Y. Inter- and intramuscular differences in training-induced hypertrophy of the quadriceps femoris: association with muscle activation during the first training session. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2015; 37(4):405–412. doi:10.1111/cpf.12318
15. Weide G, Zwaard S, Huijing A, Jaspers T. 3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue. J Vis Exp. 2017. Issue 129. P. 55943. doi:10.3791/55943

Publication:

«World of Medicine and Biology» Vol. 20 No. 88 (2024) , с. 71-76
УДК 611.748.22.06-044.5-073.432.19:796.332.071.2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2024-2-88-71-76