| About the author: |
Artyshchuk V., Vorobets D., Sheremeta R., Sheremeta D., Lychkovsky O. |
| Heading |
CLINICAL MEDICINE |
| Type of article |
Scentific article |
| Annotation |
ESWL and PCNL effectivities after 45 and 90 days after fragmentation and extraction of lower pole kidney stones were established. Also, stones burden, lower infundibular length and width, lower infundibulopelvic and infundibulotransverse angles, stone free rate influences were evaluated. PCNL is more effective than ESWL at acute infundibulopelvic angle for stone free rate for 55,7% at 45 day and 33,3% at 90 day after operation. Complications and accessory procedures levels reminds the same but PCNL is associated with long operation period and less extended hospitalization staying. PCNL is more effective than ESWL at obtuse infundibulopelvic angle for stone free rate for 24,5% at 45 day and 0,9% at 90 day after operation with similar complication and accessory procedures rates. |
| Tags |
lower pole stone, infundibulopelvic angle, infundibultransverse angle |
| Bibliography |
- Al-Bareeq R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi / R. Al-Bareeq, J.D. Denstedt // Can. Urol. Assoc J. – 2008. – Vol.2,№6. – P.628–630.
- Anastasiadis A. Impact of stone density on outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): an analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society (CROES) PCNL global study database / A. Anastasiadis, B. Onal, P. Modi [et al.] // Scand. J. Urol. – 2013. – Vol.47,№6. – P.509-514.
- Donaldson J.F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones / J.F. Donaldson, M. Lardas, D. Scrimgeour [et al.] // Eur. Urol. – 2015. – Vol.67, №4. – Р.612-616.
- El-Bahnasy A.M. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave litotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy / A.M. El-Bahnasy, A.L. Shalhav, D.M. Hoenig [et al.] // J. Urol. 1998. – Vol.159. – P. 676-682.
- Gozen A.S. Renal anatomical factors for the lower calyceal stone formation / A.S. Gozen, A.S. Kilic, T. Aktoz, H. Akdere // Int. Urol. Nephrol. – 2006. – Vol.38, №1. – P.79-85.
- Jessen J.P. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones: influence of the collecting system's anatomy. J.P. Jessen, P. Honeck, T. Knoll [et al.] // J. Endourol. – 2014. – Vol. 28, №2. – Р. 146-151.
- Kilicarslan H. Unfavorable anatomical factors influencing the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renalcalculi / H. Kilicarslan, Y. Kaynak, Y. Kordan [et al.] // Urol. J. – 2015. – Vol.29, №12. – Р. 2065-2068.
- Nagele U. Lower pole calyceal stones / U. Nagele, T. Knoll, D. Schilling [et al.] // Urologe A. – 2008. – Vol.47, №7. – P.875-884.
- Rojas A. Shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole renal stones? / A. Rojas, H., J.A. Salvadó // Medwave. – 2015. – Vol.9, №15. – Р. 6254.
- Sampaio F.J. Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy / F.J. Sampaio, A.H. Aragao // J. Urol. – 1992. – Vol. 147. – P.322-324.
- Torricelli F.C. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography / F.C. Torricelli, G.S. Marchini, F.I. Yamauchi [at al.] // J. Urol. – 2015. – Vol.193, №6. – P. 2002-2007.
- Vilches R.M. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment oflower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study / R.M. Vilches, A. Aliaga, D. Reyes [et al.] // Actas Urol Esp. – 2015. – Vol.39, №4. – P.236-242.
|
| Publication of the article |
«World of Medicine and Biology» №3(57), 2016 year, 009-014 pages, index UDK 616.617-007.3-08-059 |
