English Українська
  • Main
  • Useful links
  • Information for Contributors
  • About
  • Editorial board

  • Article
    M.O. Dmitriev, A.I. Kondratyuk, O.N. Semenenko, A.L. Kondratiuk

    HOLDAWAY`S SOFT-TISSUE CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS NORMS FOR THE UKRAINIAN POPULATION


    About the author: M.O. Dmitriev, A.I. Kondratyuk, O.N. Semenenko, A.L. Kondratiuk
    Heading CLINICAL MEDICINE
    Type of article Scentific article
    Annotation Numerous studies prove the opposite viewpoint and conclusions about the influence of cephalometric parameters of hard and soft tissues on the aesthetic result that the physician gets at the end of orthodontic treatment. Therefore, there is a need to continue research on the accumulation, analysis and modeling of the patterns of the structure of the craniofacial complex, taking into account ethnic, age and sexual characteristics. The purpose of the work is to study the features of cephalometric parameters in Ukrainian boys and girls with orthognathic bite using the Holdaway method compared to the results established for other races and ethnic groups. With the Veraviewepocs 3D device, Morita (Japan) in 38 boys (in age from 17 to 21 years) and 55 girls (aged from 16 to 20 years) with physiological bite maximally close to the orthognathic side teleroentgenograms were obtained. Measurements were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of R. A. Holdaway (1983, 1984), and cephalometric points were determined according to A. E. Athanasiou (1997) and S. I. Doroshenko, Ye. A. Kulgynskiy (2007). The article presents the cephalometric parameters of soft facial tissues by the Holdaway method for the Ukrainian population of juvenile age with orthognathic bite and evaluates the discrepancies of these parameters with the results obtained by researchers in the study of other populations according to this technique. Among the Ukrainian boys or girls with orthognathic bite and gender-specific indicators of the Saudi, Turkish, North American, Palestinian and Persia populations, as well as with the Japanese (regardless of sex), there are numerous differences in teleroentgenogram indices by the Holdaway method. The largest number of discrepancies in these indicators is set with the Japanese, and the smallest - with the Palestinians.
    Tags Holdaway`s analysis, cephalometry, Ukrainian boys and girls, orthognathic bite
    Bibliography
    • Doroshenko SI, Kulginskiy EA. Osnovy telerentgenografii. Кyiv: Zdorovya; 2007. 72 р. [in Russian]
    • Alcalde RE, Jinno T, Orsini MG, Sasaki A, Sugiyama RM, Matsumura T. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118(1):84-9.
    • Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. London. Osby Wolfe; 1997. 241-292 р.
    • Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 1993; 103: 299-312.
    • Barakatia NA, Bindayelb K. Holdaway soft tissue cephalometric standards for Saudi adults. Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences. 2012; 3(1): 27-32.
    • Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123(4): 395-400.
    • Bowman SJ, Johnston LEJr. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70: 3-10.
    • Bronfman CN, Janson G, Pinzan A, Rocha TL. Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2015; 20(6): 43-51.
    • Celebi A.A, Tan E, Gelgor IE, Colak T, Ayyildiz E. Comparison of Soft Tissue Cephalometric Norms between Turkish and European-American Adults. The Scientific World Journal. 2013; Article ID 806203: 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/806203.
    • Coleman G, Lindauer S, Tufekci E, Shroff B, Best A. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(1): 36-42.
    • Gonzalez MB, Caruso JM, Sugiyama RM, Schlenker WL. Establishing cephalometric norms for a Mexican population using Ricketts, Steiner, Tweed and Arnett analyses. APOS Trends Orthod. 2013; 3: 171-177.
    • Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am. J. Orthod. 1983; 84(1): 1-28.
    • Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthod. 2002; 122: 67-72.
    • Shindoi JM, Matsumoto Y, Sato Y, Ono T, Harada K. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic and cosmetic surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2013; 71(1): 24-30.
    • Wholley CJ, Woods MG. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73: 386-395.
    Publication of the article «World of Medicine and Biology» №3(65), 2018 year, 063-068 pages, index UDK 616.314-084
    DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-3-65-63-68