English Українська
  • Main
  • Useful links
  • Information for Contributors
  • About
  • Editorial board

  • Article
    V.F. Makeev, Y.S. Leshchuk, A.V. Paliy, V.V. Ivanchyshyn, L.V. Dubrovna

    FUNCTIONAL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PROSTHESES WITH AND WITHOUT ELASTIC LINING


    About the author: V.F. Makeev, Y.S. Leshchuk, A.V. Paliy, V.V. Ivanchyshyn, L.V. Dubrovna
    Heading CLINICAL MEDICINE
    Type of article Scentific article
    Annotation In accordance with the terms of adaptation in patients with complete removable plate prostheses (CRPP) with and without elastic lining, the functional suitability of prostheses was studied, namely chewing samples were tested, the number of corrections of prostheses with and without elastic lining was determined and the functional possibilities of the chewing system were studied by the gnathodynamometric method. In the first adaptation period the chewing test rate was on average 32±2.4% in patients with non-elastic lining prostheses and 48±1.8 and 52±1.4% in patients with elastic linings PM-S and Ufi Gel P (p<0.05). In the second adaptation period which lasted up to 5 days after the placing of prostheses an improvement in the results of chewing test was noted in the І group of patients the average chewing test was 38±2.1%, while in groups II and III 68±1.6 and 69±1.8% (p<0.001). The same trend is observed in the third adaptation period in patients with a hard acrylic CRPP the average chewing test rate was 64±1.8% and in patients with elastic linings PM-S and Ufi Gel P 92±1.2 and 93±1,6% (p<0.001). The analysis of chewing tests showed that the percentage of food fragmentation was 39% higher in patients who had prostheses with Ufi Gel P lining and 34% higher in patients who had prostheses with an elastic PM-S lining compared to those obtained in patients with prostheses without elastic lining.
    Tags tooth-jaw system, removable plate prostheses, elastic linings, chewing tests, adaptation to prostheses
    Bibliography
    • Bezyazychna NV. Efektyvnist ortopedychnoho likuvannya patsiyetiv z chastkovoyu adentiyeyu znimnymy protezamy z myakoyu pidkladkoyu. Ukrayinskyi medychnyi almanakh. 2012;15(6):15-17 [in Ukrainian]
    • Korol DM, Skubyi YV, Kozak RV, Cherevko FA, Pekhno VV. Metodika funktsionalnogo opredeleniya zhevatelnoy effektyvnosti. Pryvolzhskyi nauchnyi vestnik. 2015;5:82-85. [in Russian]
    • Materialoznavstvo u stomatolohiyi. Korol MD, red. Vinnytsya: Nova knyha, 2008:235. [in Ukrainian]
    • Nidzelskyi MYa, Krynychko LR. Analitychnyi ohlyad reaktsiy tkanyn rotovoyi porozhnyny na znimni zubni akrylovi protezy pry yikh korystuvanni. Problemy ekolohiyi ta medytsyny. 2010;14(3-4):8-11. [in Ukrainian]
    • Rozumenko VA. Klinicheskaya aprobatsiya usovershenstvovannogo metoda izgotovleniya polnogo syemnogo proteza pri neperenosimosti akrilovoy plastmassy. Ukrayinskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2011;4:42-45. [in Russian]
    • Romanova YUG, Lepskiy VV, Zhizhikin OI. Chastota proyavleniya allergicheskikh reaktsiy v polosti rta na akrilovyie plastmassy. Vísnik stomatolohiyi. 2011;2:78-80. [in Russian]
    • Allen PF, McKenna G, Creugers N. Prosthodontic care for elderly patients. Dent Update. 2011;38(7):460-462.
    • De Baat C, Witter DJ, Creugers NH. Acrylic resin removable partial dentures. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2011;118(1):32-37.
    • Fueki K, Igarashi Y, Maeda Y, Baba K, Koyano K, Sasaki K et al. Factors related to prosthetic restoration in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(7):525-532.
    • Gendreau L, Loewy ZG. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(4):251-260.
    • Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(2):109-117.
    • Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, De Souza JF, Jorge JH. Changes in roughness of denture base and reline materials by chemical disinfection or microwave irradiation: surface roughness of denture base and reline materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):521-528.
    • Reissmann DR, Schierz O, Szentpetery AG, John MT. Improved perceived general health is observed with prosthodontic treatment. J Dent. 2011;39(4):326-331.
    • Van der Bilt A. Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(10):754-780.
    • Williams DW, Chamary N, Lewis MA, Milward PJ, McAndrew R. Microbial contamination of removable prosthodontic appliances from laboratories and impact of clinical storage. Brit Dent J. 2011;211(4):163-166.
    Publication of the article «World of Medicine and Biology» №3(65), 2018 year, 091-095 pages, index UDK 616.314-089.28.002
    DOI 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-3-65-91-95