| About the author: |
D. P. Shaienko, Ye. V. Stetsuk, L. V. Smahliuk, V. I. Shepitko, V. I. Smahliuk |
| Heading |
CLINICAL MEDICINE |
| Type of article |
Scentific article |
| Annotation |
Orthodontic implants, as the skeletal anchorage systems, are widely used by orthodontists due to their property to minimize the impact on the patient’s teeth. To identify the factors influencing the contact area between the orthodontic implant and bone, as well as bone resorption around the orthodontic implant. The experimental study compared two methods of orthodontic implant placement: leaving the implant’s threaded part in the cortical bone plate and inserting the implant’s neck into the bone. Using the same pressure on adjacent implants, the condition of the bone surrounding them was assessed. Leaving the implant’s threaded portion within the cortical bone plate increases its damage and the implant’s mobility under applied load. A smooth surface with an expanded neck of orthodontic implants provides a larger and denser contact with the cortical bone plate, which distributes the orthodontic load more effectively, thereby reducing the traumatic impact on bone tissue under force application. |
| Tags |
implants,primary stability,anchorage,mandible,orthodontic treatment,damage,tooth,bone |
| Bibliography |
- Bahriy MM, Dibrova VA, Popadynets OH, Hryshchuk MI. Metodyky morfolohichnykh doslidzhen. Vinnytsya: Nova knyha. 2016. [in Ukrainian].
- Smahliuk LV, Shaienko DP, Liakhovska AV, Smahliuk VI. Vyznachennia chynnykiv vplyvu na pervynnu stabilnist ortodontychnykh miniimplantiv. Odeskyi medychnyi zhurnal. 2024; 3 :19–24. doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2024-3-3 [in Ukrainian].
- Starchenko II. Zastosuvannia metodu plastynatsii v stereomorfolohichnykh doslidzhenniakh. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2006; 2 :420–422. [in Ukrainian].
- Derton N, Palone M, Siciliani G, Albertini P, Cremonini F, Lombardo L. Resolution of lower second molar impaction through miniscrew-supported biomechanics: A proposal for a simplified classification. International Orthodontics. 2021; 19(4) :697–706. doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.09.008.
- Hong SB, Kusnoto B, Kim EJ, BeGole EA, Hwang HS, Lim HJ. Prognostic factors associated with the success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants: A subgroup meta-analysis. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2016; 46(2) :111–126. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.2.111.
- Jabri M, Zhang Y, Yongchu P, Ma J. An Overview on Mini-screws Compliance as Anchorage Unit in Orthodontic Practice. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 2018; 10(23) : 7–12. doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2018.10232.
- Jin J, Kim GT, Kwon JS, Choi SH. Effects of intrabony length and cortical bone density on the primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews. Materials. 2020; 13(24) :5615. doi.org/10.3390/ma13245615.
- Melsen B, Dalstra M. Skeletal anchorage in the past, today and tomorrow. L’Orthodontie francaise. 2017; 88(1) :35–44. DOI: 10.1051/orthodfr/2016052.
- Singh A, Kannan S, Arora N, Bajaj Y, Revankar A. Measurement of primary stability of mini implants using resonance frequency analysis. APOS Trends in Orthodontics. 2018; 8(3) :139. doi: 10.4103/apos.apos_20_18.
- Xin Y, Wu Y, Chen C, Wang C, Zhao L. Miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: analysis of risk factors correlated with the progressive susceptibility to failure. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2022; 162(4) :192-202. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.07.013.
|
| Publication of the article |
«World of Medicine and Biology» №1(91), 2025 year, 135-140 pages, index UDK 616.314-089.843:611.018.4 |
| DOI |
10.26724/2079-8334-2025-1-91-135-140 |
